J Biomed Semantics. 2023 Dec 5;14(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13326-023-00299-3.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare data and the knowledge gleaned from it play a key role in improving the health of current and future patients. These knowledge sources are regularly represented as 'linked' resources based on the Resource Description Framework (RDF). Making resources 'linkable' to facilitate their interoperability is especially important in the rare-disease domain, where health resources are scattered and scarce. However, to benefit from using RDF, resources need to be of good quality. Based on existing metrics, we aim to assess the quality of RDF resources related to rare diseases and provide recommendations for their improvement.

METHODS: Sixteen resources of relevance for the rare-disease domain were selected: two schemas, three metadatasets, and eleven ontologies. These resources were tested on six objective metrics regarding resolvability, parsability, and consistency. Any URI that failed the test based on any of the six metrics was recorded as an error. The error count and percentage of each tested resource were recorded. The assessment results were represented in RDF, using the Data Quality Vocabulary schema.

RESULTS: For three out of the six metrics, the assessment revealed quality issues. Eleven resources have non-resolvable URIs with proportion to all URIs ranging from 0.1% (6/6,712) in the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification to 13.7% (17/124) in the WikiPathways Ontology; seven resources have undefined URIs; and two resources have incorrectly used properties of the 'owl:ObjectProperty' type. Individual errors were examined to generate suggestions for the development of high-quality RDF resources, including the tested resources.

CONCLUSION: We assessed the resolvability, parsability, and consistency of RDF resources in the rare-disease domain, and determined the extent of these types of errors that potentially affect interoperability. The qualitative investigation on these errors reveals how they can be avoided. All findings serve as valuable input for the development of a guideline for creating high-quality RDF resources, thereby enhancing the interoperability of biomedical resources.

PMID:38053130 | DOI:10.1186/s13326-023-00299-3

Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Sept 28;48(9):1388-1396. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2023.220639.

ABSTRACT

Rare pediatric neurogenetic diseases always have early onset, no specific therapy, high mortality, and pose a severe risk to the health and survival of children. Adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated gene therapy, a type of disease-modifying therapy, provides a new option for the treatment of rare pediatric neurogenetic diseases and represents a significant advancement in the field. Currently, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Association (EMA) have approved AAV-mediated gene therapy medications for treating spinal muscular atrophy, aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase deficiency, and Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Numerous preclinical and clinical trial research findings from recent years indicate that AAV-mediated gene therapy has a promising future in treating genetic disorders. The quick approval process for rare diseases medications may bring hope for the treatment of children with rare neurogenetic diseases. AAV-mediated gene therapy is an emerging technology with certain risks and challenges. It is necessary to establish a standardized regulatory system and a sound long-term follow-up system to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gene therapy.

PMID:38044650 | DOI:10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2023.220639

Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Nov 30;18(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02987-w.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While substantial placebos have been used in herbal medicine (HM) clinical trials for rare diseases, the use and quality of reporting of HM-placebo remain unclear. We aim to describe the use of HM-placebo in clinical trials for rare diseases and determine the quality of reporting in these trials.

METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, National Institute of Informatics Support Academic Information Services, ClinicalTrials.gov and Chinese Clinical Trials Registry from their inception date to 14 February 2023 to identify registered and published trials that use placebos as a comparator in rare diseases. We collected data on placebo use reporting and the efficacy and safety of placebo. Descriptive statistics, the Chi-square test, and Binary multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to determine the placebo characteristics of the HM trial and its effect on reporting.

RESULTS: Among the 55 studies, we included that with a median administration time of placebo of 84 days (IQR 42-180) and a median placebo sample size of 30 (IQR 24-54). About half of the trials (27, 49.1%) did not provide their ethical approvals, and one trial had details of informed consent. None of the studies were fully reported and more than half of the items reported less than 50%. A total of 10 trials (18.2%) of placebo has active ingredients even though none of them performed pharmacological inert tests. Of the 29 studies with available data on adverse events, 5 (17.2%) trials did not show a better safety profile in the placebo group. Under the context that a relatively high-quality report is defined as a report with more than 9 items, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in the rate of relatively high-quality reports of the administration time (p = 0.047, OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.90), but the results are not representative.

CONCLUSION: The overall situation of HM-placebo in the field of rare diseases was poor. In particular, the placebo is tied to the quality of trials, and poor placebo hinders the generation of high-quality evidence for herbal clinical trials in the field of rare diseases. We summarize the current methods of assessment involved in the use of placebos and propose various considerations for placebos in different contexts. Our study can greatly promote rare disease researchers to review the quality of their placebo and clinical trials. It is imperative to guarantee that meticulously conducted research generates clinical evidence of the highest caliber. We also expect that in the future, more rigorous relevant standards about the reporting and design of HM-placebo will be developed. High-quality clinical trials are the prerequisite for the wide clinical application of herbal medicines for rare diseases.

PMID:38037078 | PMC:PMC10691121 | DOI:10.1186/s13023-023-02987-w

Trop Doct. 2023 Nov 29:494755231217325. doi: 10.1177/00494755231217325. Online ahead of print.

NO ABSTRACT

PMID:38031360 | DOI:10.1177/00494755231217325

BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 29;13(11):e069441. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069441.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Genomic testing is a relatively new, disruptive and complex health technology with multiple clinical applications in rare diseases, cancer and infection control. Genomic testing is increasingly being implemented into clinical practice, following regulatory approval, funding and adoption in models of care, particularly in the area of rare disease diagnosis. A significant barrier to the adoption and implementation of genomic testing is funding. What remains unclear is what the cost of genomic testing is, what the underlying drivers of cost are and whether policy differences contribute to cost variance in different jurisdictions, such as the requirement to have staff with a medical license involved in testing. This costing study will be useful in future economic evaluations and health technology assessments to inform optimal levels of reimbursement and to support comprehensive and comparable assessment of healthcare resource utilisation in the delivery of genomic testing globally.

METHODS: A framework is presented that focuses on uncovering the process of genomic testing for any given laboratory, evaluating its utilisation and unit costs, and modelling the cost drivers and overall expenses associated with delivering genomic testing. The goal is to aid in refining and implementing policies regarding both the regulation and funding of genomic testing. A process-focused (activity-based) methodology is outlined, which encompasses resources, assesses individual cost components through a combination of bottom-up and top-down microcosting techniques and allows disaggregation of resource type and process step.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The outputs of the study will be reported at relevant regional genetics and health economics conferences, as well as submitted to a peer-reviewed journal focusing on genomics. Human research ethics committee approval is not required for this microcosting study. This study does not involve research on human subjects, and all data used in the analysis are either publicly available.

PMID:38030253 | DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069441

Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Nov 28;18(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02978-x.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Compassionate use is a system that provides patients with expedited access to drugs which has not yet been approved, but currently in clinical trials. The investigational drugs have been authorized for compassionate use in cases involving patients suffered from life-threatening diseases and with no alternative treatments. For instance, patients afflicted with highly heterogeneous rare diseases are eligible for treatment assistance through the compassionate use program. This study aims to investigate the characteristics of compassionate use in the context of rare diseases, evaluate the efficacy and safety of compassionate use for rare diseases, and analyze the marketing approval of investigational drugs.

METHODS: The case reports/case series of compassionate use were collected by conducting searches on Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI and SinoMed, spanning from January 1991 to December 2022. Subsequently, two independent reviewers evaluated these reports. Case reports/case series that met the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria were enrolled. Information extracted from these reports and series included patients' basic information, the investigational drug's name, its indication, adverse events, treatment outcomes, and other relevant data.

RESULTS: A total of forty-six studies were included, encompassing 2079 patients with an average age of 38.1 years. Thirty-nine different drugs were involved in 46 studies. Furthermore, neoplasms emerged as the most common therapeutic area for compassionate use in rare disease management (23/46, 50.0%). Regarding the treatment efficacy, four studies reported successful disease resolution, while 35 studies observed symptom improvement among patients. Conversely, four studies documented no significant effects on patients' diseases. Moreover, one study reported worsened results following compassionate use, while the efficacy was not described in 2 studies. Adverse events were reported in 31 studies (67.4%) because of the compassionate use, while no adverse events occurred in 13 studies (28.3%). In other 2 studies, there was no description about whether treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were happened. 136 patients (6.5%) had Grade 5 adverse events (death), of which 19 deaths (0.9%) were considered to be related to compassionate use. Furthermore, the investigational drugs in 33 studies (33/46, 71.7%) received new drug approval at the end of January 31, 2023.The time lag from the start of the compassionate use to the formal approval of the investigational drug was 790.5 (IQR 359-2199.3) days. We found that in 11 studies, encompassing 9 different drugs, some compassionate use indications had not received regulatory authorities at the end of January 31, 2023.

CONCLUSION: The current status of compassionate use for rare diseases was clarified systematically in this study. Compassionate use of investigational drug is a significant treatment option for rare disease. In general, compassionate use appears to demonstrate favorable efficacy in the context of rare diseases, with a significant proportion of compassionate use drugs subsequently receiving marketing approval. However, the safety of drugs for compassionate use cannot be fully evaluated due to the safety data were not covered in some enrolled studies. Therefore, the establishment of an adverse event reporting system specific to compassionate use is warranted.

PMID:38017575 | PMC:PMC10685565 | DOI:10.1186/s13023-023-02978-x

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 Nov 29. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03810-4. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rare diseases are often characterized by complex symptoms and usually require coordination of multiprofessional treatment during the diagnostic and healthcare processes. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the healthcare situation and daily life of people with rare diseases and the caregivers of children with rare diseases changed drastically. The aim of the research project RESILIENT-SE-PAN was to assess the situation of people with rare diseases and caregivers during COVID-19 and to develop recommendations based on the findings.

METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods study including the perspective of people with rare diseases, caregivers and representatives from patient organizations and conducted a concluding workshop.

RESULTS: The findings indicate an impact on healthcare and daily life of participants. Moreover, mental burden, supportive needs, COVID-19-specific aspects but also positive aspects were mentioned. Based on the findings from our mixed methods study, we developed 21 recommendations referring to the following topics: medical diagnostics and healthcare of the rare diseases, additional therapies and aids, access to COVID-19 information and vaccination, psychosocial support, participation and activities, patient organisations and others.

DISCUSSION: The recommendations can provide an orientation for the organisation of healthcare in future crises or pandemics in order to adequately take the situations of people with rare diseases into account and consider the needs of this patient group.

PMID:38019314 | DOI:10.1007/s00103-023-03810-4

JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Jan 1;184(1):63-69. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.6293.

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) requires Medicare to negotiate prices for some high-spending drugs but exempts drugs approved solely for the treatment of a single rare disease.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate Medicare spending and global revenues for drugs that might have been exempt from negotiation from 2012 to 2021.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study analyzed drugs that met the IRA threshold for price negotiation (Medicare spending >$200 million/y) in any year from 2012 to 2021 and had an Orphan Drug Act designation. We stratified drugs into 4 mutually exclusive categories: approved for a single rare disease (sole orphan), approved for multiple rare diseases (multiorphan), initially approved for a rare disease and subsequently approved for a nonrare disease (orphan first), and initially approved for a nonrare disease and subsequently approved for a rare disease (non-orphan first).

OUTCOMES: The primary outcomes were the number of sole orphan drugs, estimated Medicare spending on those drugs from 2012 to 2021, and global revenue since launch.

RESULTS: Among 282 drugs, 95 (34%) were approved to treat at least 1 rare disease, including 25 sole orphan drugs (26%), 20 multiorphan drugs (21%), 13 orphan first drugs (14%), and 37 non-orphan first drugs (39%). From 2012 to 2021, Medicare spending on sole orphan drugs increased from $3.4 billion to $10.0 billion. Each year, a median (IQR) of $2.5 ($1.9-$2.6) billion in Medicare spending would have been excluded from price negotiation because of the sole orphan exemption. The cumulative global revenue of the median (IQR) sole orphan drug was $11 ($6.6-$19.2) billion.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The sole orphan exemption will exclude billions of dollars of Medicare drug spending from price negotiation. The high level of global revenues achieved by these drugs, however, suggests that special exemption is unnecessary for them to achieve financial success. Congress could consider removing the sole orphan exemption to obtain additional savings for patients and taxpayers and to eliminate any potential disincentive for developing additional indications for these drugs.

PMID:38010643 | PMC:PMC10682941 | DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.6293

CMAJ. 2023 Nov 26;195(46):E1565-E1576. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.230841.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Globally, pharmaceutical companies offer patient support programs in tandem with their products, which aim to enhance medication adherence and patient experience through education, training, support and financial assistance. We sought to identify the proportion and characteristics of such patient support programs in Canada and to describe the nature of supports provided.

METHODS: We conducted a crosssectional study to identify and characterize all marketed prescription drugs available in Canada as of Aug. 23, 2022, using the Health Canada Drug Product and CompuScript databases. To describe the nature of supports provided, we conducted a content analysis of publicly available patient support program websites and Web-based documents. Using logistic regression, we identified characteristics of drugs associated with having a patient support program including brand-name or branded generic (generic medications with a proprietary name), orphan (medications for rare diseases) or biologic drug status; estimated total cost of prescriptions dispensed at retail pharmacies; and price per unit.

RESULTS: Of the 2556 prescription drugs marketed by 89 companies in the study period, 256 (10.0%) had a patient support program in Canada. Many of the 89 drug manufacturers (n = 55, 61.8%) offered at least 1 patient support program, frequently relying on third-party administrators for delivery. Brandname and branded generic medications, biologic agents and drugs with orphan status were more likely to have a patient support program than generic drugs. Compared with drugs priced $1.01-$10.00 per unit, drugs priced $10.01-$100.00 per unit were nearly 8 times more likely to have a patient support program (adjusted odds ratio 7.54, 95% confidence interval 4.07- 14.64). Most sampled patient support programs included reimbursement navigation (n = 231, 90.2%) and clinical case management (n = 223, 87.1%).

INTERPRETATION: About 1 in 10 drugs marketed in Canada has a manufacturersponsored patient support program, but these are concentrated around brand-name, branded generic, biologic and high-cost drugs, often for rare diseases. To understand the impact of patient support programs on health outcomes and sustainable access to cost-effective medicines, greater transparency and independent evaluation of patient support programs is necessary.

PMID:38011930 | DOI:10.1503/cmaj.230841

Farm Hosp. 2024 Jan-Feb;48(1):T3-T8. doi: 10.1016/j.farma.2023.10.004. Epub 2023 Nov 25.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the presence of Good Humanisation Practices in the care of patients with rare diseases in Hospital Pharmacy Services and to identify the strengths and prevalent areas for improvement in the humanisation of healthcare.

METHODS: An online questionnaire structured in 2 parts was developed using Google Form®. The first one was designed to collect identifying data and the second one included questions related to compliance with the 61 standards of the Manual of Good Humanisation Practices in the healthcare of patients with rare diseases in Hospital Pharmacy Services. Access to the questionnaire was sent by email to the Heads of the Hospital Pharmacy Service of 18 hospitals. The study period was from October 2021 to October 2022. The analysed variables were the number of criteria that were considered met, total compliance (percentage of criteria met), by strategic line and by type or level of standard, globally and grouped by regions of Spain.

RESULTS: 18 Hospital Pharmacy Services were included. The overall mean of standards met was 31.1 (95% CI: 24.8-37.6) and mean total compliance was 52.1% (95% CI: 44.4%-59.7%). The mean compliance by strategic line was: Line 1, Humanisation culture: 46.5% (95% CI: 35.3%-57.7%), Line 2, Patient empowerment: 47.4% (95% CI: 37.1%-57.8%), Line 3, Professional care: 49.7% (95% CI: 39.8%-59.1%), Line 4, Physical spaces and comfort: 55.6% (95% CI: 46.3%-64.8%), and Line 5, Organisation of healthcare: 63.8% (95% CI: 55.8%-71.9%).

CONCLUSION: The average compliance with the standards is between 40% and 60%, which indicates that humanisation is present in the Hospital Pharmacy Services, but there is a wide margin for improvement. The main strength in the humanisation of Hospital Pharmacy Services is a patient-centred care organisation, and the area with the greatest room for improvement is the culture of humanisation.

PMID:38008659 | DOI:10.1016/j.farma.2023.10.004

Genes (Basel). 2023 Nov 18;14(11):2100. doi: 10.3390/genes14112100.

ABSTRACT

Phenotypicheterogeneity is a phenomenon in which distinct phenotypes can develop in individuals bearing pathogenic variants in the same gene. Genetic factors, gene interactions, and environmental factors are usually considered the key mechanisms of this phenomenon. Phenotypic heterogeneity may impact the prognosis of the disease severity and symptoms. In our work, we used publicly available data on the association between genetic variants and Mendelian disease to investigate the genetic factors (such as the intragenic localization and type of a variant) driving the heterogeneity of gene-disease relationships. First, we showed that genes linked to multiple rare diseases (GMDs) are more constrained and tend to encode more transcripts with high levels of expression across tissues. Next, we assessed the role of variant localization and variant types in specifying the exact phenotype for GMD variants. We discovered that none of these factors is sufficient to explain the phenomenon of such heterogeneous gene-disease relationships. In total, we identified only 38 genes with a weak trend towards significant differences in variant localization and 30 genes with nominal significant differences in variant type for the two associated disorders. Remarkably, four of these genes showed significant differences in both tests. At the same time, our analysis suggests that variant localization and type are more important for genes linked to autosomal dominant disease. Taken together, our results emphasize the gene-level factors dissecting distinct Mendelian diseases linked to one common gene based on open-access genetic data and highlight the importance of exploring other factors that contributed to phenotypic heterogeneity.

PMID:38003043 | PMC:PMC10671084 | DOI:10.3390/genes14112100

Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Nov 23;18(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02934-9.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Poorly coordinated care can have major impacts on patients and families affected by rare conditions, with negative physical health, psychosocial and financial consequences. This study aimed to understand how care is coordinated for rare diseases in the United Kingdom.

METHODS: We undertook a national survey in the UK involving 760 adults affected by rare diseases, 446 parents/carers of people affected by rare diseases, and 251 healthcare professionals who care for people affected by rare diseases.

RESULTS: Findings suggested that a wide range of patients, parents and carers do not have coordinated care. For example, few participants reported having a care coordinator (12% patients, 14% parents/carers), attending a specialist centre (32% patients, 33% parents/carers) or having a care plan (10% patients, 44% parents/carers). A very small number of patients (2%) and parents/carers (5%) had access to all three-a care coordinator, specialist centre and care plan. Fifty four percent of patients and 33% of parents/carers reported access to none of these. On the other hand, a higher proportion of healthcare professionals reported that families with rare conditions had access to care coordinators (35%), specialist centres (60%) and care plans (40%).

CONCLUSIONS: Care for families with rare conditions is generally not well coordinated in the UK, with findings indicating limited access to care coordinators, specialist centres and care plans. Better understanding of these issues can inform how care coordination might be improved and embrace the needs and preferences of patients and families affected by rare conditions.

PMID:37996938 | PMC:PMC10668407 | DOI:10.1186/s13023-023-02934-9

Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Nov 23;18(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02892-2.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although rare diseases (RD) are increasingly becoming a priority for healthcare activities and services around the world, developing research policy for investigating RD in public settings proves challenging due to the limited nature of existing evidence. Rare conditions require the involvement of a wide range of stakeholders in order to promote general awareness and garner political support. Consequently, it is critically important to identify trends in the various types of research focusing on rare disease stakeholders, including the specific topics or issues to be included in surveys and studies focused on RD stakeholders. This systematic review and thematic analysis analyses the existing literature based on RD surveys, including the stakeholders involved, and proposes potential research priorities and initiatives for policy-making related to RD.

METHODS: Articles were downloaded and analyzed from across five electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and CINHAL) and 115 studies were included.

RESULTS: Across 115 studies, the main research participants were patients and/or caregivers (n = 77, 67.0%), health professionals (n = 18, 15.7%), and the public (n = 7, 6.1%). The studies discussed RDs in general (n = 46, 40.0%), endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases (n = 20, 17.4%) and other RDs. Experiences with RD were examined by more than half of the selected studies (n = 74, 64.3%), followed by the opinions of stakeholders (n = 24, 20.9%). Most of the studies used surveys in order to collect relevant data (n = 114, 99.1%). Additionally, the majority of the studies were conducted in high-income countries (n = 92, 80.0%) and rarely in middle and low-income countries (n = 12, 13.8%).

CONCLUSION: Stakeholder research on RD reveals that there are significant instances of unmet needs and various challenges faced by the medical system in dealing with RDs. Furthermore, public awareness and support is critical to ensuring political feasibility of increasing national-level investments for RDs and development of medical products and treatment.

PMID:37996931 | PMC:PMC10668415 | DOI:10.1186/s13023-023-02892-2

Anaesth Intensive Care. 2024 Jan;52(1):64-68. doi: 10.1177/0310057X231183981. Epub 2023 Nov 23.

ABSTRACT

A 19-year-old woman with known maple syrup urine disease presented to hospital with metabolic crisis in the setting of influenza type A infection and intractable vomiting, rapidly progressing to acute cerebral oedema manifesting as refractory seizures and decreased level of consciousness needing emergency intubation and mechanical ventilation, continuous veno-venous haemodiafiltration and thiopentone coma. A computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain demonstrated classic signs of cerebral oedema secondary to a metabolic crisis from the metabolic disorder. Her management posed multiple challenges to all teams involved due to lack of familiarity and experience in managing this clinical scenario in the adult intensive care setting.

PMID:37994838 | DOI:10.1177/0310057X231183981

PLoS One. 2023 Nov 22;18(11):e0293503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293503. eCollection 2023.

ABSTRACT

Since 72% of rare diseases are genetic in origin and mostly paediatrics, genetic newborn screening represents a diagnostic "window of opportunity". Therefore, many gNBS initiatives started in different European countries. Screen4Care is a research project, which resulted of a joint effort between the European Union Commission and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations. It focuses on genetic newborn screening and artificial intelligence-based tools which will be applied to a large European population of about 25.000 infants. The neonatal screening strategy will be based on targeted sequencing, while whole genome sequencing will be offered to all enrolled infants who may show early symptoms but have resulted negative at the targeted sequencing-based newborn screening. We will leverage artificial intelligence-based algorithms to identify patients using Electronic Health Records (EHR) and to build a repository "symptom checkers" for patients and healthcare providers. S4C will design an equitable, ethical, and sustainable framework for genetic newborn screening and new digital tools, corroborated by a large workout where legal, ethical, and social complexities will be addressed with the intent of making the framework highly and flexibly translatable into the diverse European health systems.

PMID:37992053 | PMC:PMC10664952 | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0293503

N Engl J Med. 2023 Nov 23;389(21):2010-2013. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2310332.

NO ABSTRACT

PMID:37991861 | DOI:10.1056/NEJMe2310332

bioRxiv. 2023 Nov 6:2023.11.06.565899. doi: 10.1101/2023.11.06.565899. Preprint.

ABSTRACT

The mammalian cerebral cortex shows functional specialization into regions with distinct neuronal compositions, most strikingly in the human brain, but little is known in about how cellular lineages shape cortical regional variation and neuronal cell types during development. Here, we use somatic single nucleotide variants (sSNVs) to map lineages of neuronal sub-types and cortical regions. Early-occurring sSNVs rarely respect Brodmann area (BA) borders, while late-occurring sSNVs mark neuron-generating clones with modest regional restriction, though descendants often dispersed into neighboring BAs. Nevertheless, in visual cortex, BA17 contains 30-70% more sSNVs compared to the neighboring BA18, with clones across the BA17/18 border distributed asymmetrically and thus displaying different cortex-wide dispersion patterns. Moreover, we find that excitatory neuron-generating clones with modest regional restriction consistently share low-mosaic sSNVs with some inhibitory neurons, suggesting significant co-generation of excitatory and some inhibitory neurons in the dorsal cortex. Our analysis reveals human-specific cortical cell lineage patterns, with both regional inhomogeneities in progenitor proliferation and late divergence of excitatory/inhibitory lineages.

PMID:37986891 | PMC:PMC10659282 | DOI:10.1101/2023.11.06.565899

BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 21;13(11):e072001. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072001.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Rare diseases are chronic conditions, generally incurable, progressive and disabling, which may result in early death. Access to therapeutic products, both medicines and appropriate medical devices, is essential to prevent the progression of the disease and maintain the patients' quality of life. Pharmacists can be part of health teams, in charge of guiding patients' journey, monitoring pharmacotherapy and identifying risks. This scoping review aims to identify and summarise evidence on the role of pharmacists and its impact in the field of rare diseases.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The searches will be conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guideline for protocols. Three electronic databases will be consulted. Studies reporting on qualitative and/or quantitative data from any world region will be considered. There will be no language or initial time limit for studies inclusion, until December 2022. To be eligible for inclusion, studies must focus on the role pharmacists in clinical services aimed at promote the access to medicines, prevention and resolution of problems related to pharmacotherapy. No assessments of items' quality will be made, as the purpose of this scoping review is to synthesise and describe the coverage of the evidence. Clinical, humanistic or economic outcomes from studies that meet the inclusion criteria will be included in the review. The analysis will synthesise the available evidence and may be able to push pharmaceutical practice forward, aiding professionals, educators and managers in the implementation of new approaches to better meet the needs of rare diseases and providing opportunities for future research.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Primary data will not be collected in this study and formal ethical approval is not required. The findings of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

PMID:37989368 | PMC:PMC10668274 | DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072001

J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Nov 20;7(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00655-y.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Erythropoietic protoporphyria is a rare, inherited disorder presenting in early childhood with severe, painful phototoxicity. EPP has significant impacts on health-related quality of life, though there is variable disease severity. Accurately capturing how much time individuals with EPP can spend outdoors before they develop symptoms is critical to understanding HRQoL and measuring therapeutic response. Therefore, the goal of this study was to develop a comprehensive and content valid sun exposure diary to assess the efficacy of new therapies in individuals with EPP.

METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with adult and adolescent EPP participants, as well as five clinical experts, to obtain their input on the content of an existing sun exposure diary. Revisions to the diary were made based on evidence generated in cognitive debriefing interviews analyzed in eight consecutive groups of EPP participant.

RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 17 adults and 6 adolescents with EPP. The average age of adults was 40 years and of adolescents was 14 years. Clinical experts thought the original diary needed clarification on the description of symptoms, how time outdoors was captured, and the distinction between direct vs. indirect sunlight. Participants with EPP also noted these items needed revision, and that the distinction between prodromal symptoms and full reaction symptoms should be clarified. In the final diary version, participants with EPP found most items to be clear and easy to complete/think about. Seventy-six percent of participants (13/17) asked thought the diary was easy to complete. The remainder thought the majority of the diary was easy to complete with the exception of select questions.

CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating a new treatment for EPP requires accurately capturing time in sunlight and symptoms in this unique disorder. The newly developed sun exposure diary is content valid and can be used to assess important aspects of symptoms and daily life and therefore evaluate clinically meaningful therapeutic response.

PMID:37982964 | DOI:10.1186/s41687-023-00655-y

Med Sci Monit. 2023 Nov 20;29:e941536. doi: 10.12659/MSM.941536.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND A rare disease is a health condition that rarely occurs in the population. It is estimated that up to 400 million people around the world suffer from a rare disease. This retrospective study aimed to investigate factors associated with length of hospitalization in 78 626 patients with sarcoidosis, 3294 patients with adults-onset Still's disease, and 35 549 patients with systemic sclerosis between 2009 and 2018 using data from the National Institute of Public Health in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this population-based study, we analyzed hospital discharge records of first-time and subsequent hospitalizations. To perform the statistical analyses, R software was used. RESULTS The average length of hospitalization over the selected period in the diseases was 5.39 days for sarcoidosis, 6.22 days for scleroderma, and 7.44 days for Still's disease, and was shorter for each of the diseases analyzed compared with the length of hospitalization for second and subsequent stays. There were no substantial differences in length of hospitalization between males and females. The average length of hospitalization increased with each additional comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS The study showed that hospitalizations for selected rare diseases do not cause a significant burden on the healthcare system. The results also showed that advanced age and comorbidities are important factors determining the length of hospitalization. The average length of hospital stay for selected rare diseases in Poland is not longer than the European Union (EU) average, so it can be assumed that the process of inpatient treatment in Poland is optimal.

PMID:37981760 | DOI:10.12659/MSM.941536