Safety biomarker applications in drug development.

J Toxicol Sci. 2019;44(4):225-235

Authors: Schomaker S, Ramaiah S, Khan N, Burkhardt J

Abstract
Biomarkers are invaluable drug development tools to assess and monitor safety in early clinical trials especially when exposure margins are limiting for promising therapeutics. Although progress has been made towards identifying and implementing translational safety biomarkers for a number of organ toxicities such as kidney and liver, significant biomarker gaps still exist to monitor toxicities for testis, pancreas, etc. Several precompetitive consortia [e.g., Predictive Safety Testing Consortia (PSTC), Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI)] are working with industry, academia, government, patient advocacy groups and foundations with a goal to qualify biomarkers such that they can be used in preclinical studies and clinical trials to accelerate drug development. This manuscript discusses the complexities of novel biomarker discovery, validation and international regulatory qualifications intended for clinical trial applications and shares specific examples from Pfizer Research and Development. As safety biomarkers become widely accepted and qualified by the regulatory agencies, they will increasingly be implemented in early clinical trials, play a key role in decision making and facilitate the progression of promising therapeutics from preclinical through clinical development.

PMID: 30944276 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Working Through the Paradox of Methotrexate Toxicity.

Ann Emerg Med. 2018 08;72(2):129-132

Authors: Vohra R, Vohra SS, Grock A, Mason J

PMID: 30031507 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

The effect of istradefylline for Parkinson's disease: A meta-analysis.

Sci Rep. 2017 12 21;7(1):18018

Authors: Sako W, Murakami N, Motohama K, Izumi Y, Kaji R

Abstract
Adenosine A2A receptor antagonists are an alternative treatment strategy for Parkinson's disease. Several randomized placebo controlled studies have tested the effect of A2A receptor antagonist istradefylline, and more robust evidence has been acquired. This meta-analysis aimed to provide evidence for its efficacy and safety on patients with Parkinson's disease. After a systematic literature search, we calculated the pooled standardized mean difference and risk ratio for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Further, sensitivity analyses were performed to confirm the effect estimated by meta-analyses. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot and deviation of intercept. Six studies satisfied our inclusion criteria. Istradefylline (40 mg/day) decreased off time and improved motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease in homogeneous studies. Istradefylline at 20 mg/day decreased off time and improved motor symptoms, but heterogeneity was found in the analysis of the former among studies. There was a significant effect of istradefylline on dyskinesia in homogeneous studies. Publication bias, however, was observed in the comparison of dyskinesia. Other adverse events showed no significant difference. The present meta-analysis suggests that istradefylline at 40 mg/day could alleviate off time and motor symptoms derived from Parkinson's disease. Dyskinesia might be worsened, but publication bias prevents this from being clear.

PMID: 29269791 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Facilitating prediction of adverse drug reactions by using knowledge graphs and multi-label learning models.

Brief Bioinform. 2019 01 18;20(1):190-202

Authors: Muñoz E, Novácek V, Vandenbussche PY

Abstract
Timely identification of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is highly important in the domains of public health and pharmacology. Early discovery of potential ADRs can limit their effect on patient lives and also make drug development pipelines more robust and efficient. Reliable in silico prediction of ADRs can be helpful in this context, and thus, it has been intensely studied. Recent works achieved promising results using machine learning. The presented work focuses on machine learning methods that use drug profiles for making predictions and use features from multiple data sources. We argue that despite promising results, existing works have limitations, especially regarding flexibility in experimenting with different data sets and/or predictive models. We suggest to address these limitations by generalization of the key principles used by the state of the art. Namely, we explore effects of: (1) using knowledge graphs-machine-readable interlinked representations of biomedical knowledge-as a convenient uniform representation of heterogeneous data; and (2) casting ADR prediction as a multi-label ranking problem. We present a specific way of using knowledge graphs to generate different feature sets and demonstrate favourable performance of selected off-the-shelf multi-label learning models in comparison with existing works. Our experiments suggest better suitability of certain multi-label learning methods for applications where ranking is preferred. The presented approach can be easily extended to other feature sources or machine learning methods, making it flexible for experiments tuned toward specific requirements of end users. Our work also provides a clearly defined and reproducible baseline for any future related experiments.

PMID: 28968655 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Construction and content validation of checklist for patient safety in emergency care.

Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2017 Jun 05;37(spe):e68778

Authors: Amaya MR, Paixão DPDSSD, Sarquis LMM, Cruz EDA

Abstract
Objective: To construct and validate a checklist for patient safety in emergency care.
Method: This is methodological research conducted in Curitiba, in 2015, with construction and validation stages. The checklist was based on the guidelines of the Brazilian patient safety programme and validated online using the Delphi method, with a questionnaire, and with the participation of 23 Brazilian specialists in the first round and 20 in the second round. The data were analysed using the Content Validity Index (CVI), Cronbach's α, and Fisher's Exact Test.
Results: We produced a checklist with 18 valid and reliable items (94% of CVI, Cronbach's α = 0.91).
Conclusions: The checklist comprises patient safety actions and items to predict risk situations, corrective actions, and promote safety in emergency services and other health-related contexts.

PMID: 28640335 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

16 new pubmed citations were retrieved for your search. Click on the search hyperlink below to display the complete search results:

("drug-induced" OR "drug-related") AND ("adverse events" OR "side effects" OR "side-effects")

These pubmed results were generated on 2019/07/19

PubMed comprises more than millions of citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.

17 new pubmed citations were retrieved for your search. Click on the search hyperlink below to display the complete search results:

("drug-induced" OR "drug-related") AND ("adverse events" OR "side effects" OR "side-effects")

These pubmed results were generated on 2019/07/18

PubMed comprises more than millions of citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.

Hepatitis B screening rates and reactivation in solid organ malignancy patients undergoing chemotherapy in Southern Thailand.

Clin Mol Hepatol. 2019 Jul 17;:

Authors: Laiwatthanapaisan R, Sripongpun P, Chamroonkul N, Dechaphunkul A, Sathitruangsak C, Sakdejayont S, Kongkamol C, Piratvisuth T

Abstract
Background/Aims: Hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) following chemotherapy (CMT) is well-known among hematologic malignancies, and screening recommendations are established. However, HBVr data in solid organ malignancy (SOM) patients are limited. This study aims to determine hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) screening rates, HBV prevalence, and the rate of significant hepatitis caused by HBVr in SOM patients undergoing CMT.
Methods: Based on the Oncology unit's registration database from 2009-2013, we retrospectively reviewed records of all SOM patients ≥18 years undergoing CMT at Songklanagarind Hospital who were followed until death or ≥6 months after CMT sessions. Exclusion criteria included patients without baseline liver function tests (LFTs) and who underwent CMT before the study period. We obtained and analyzed baseline clinical characteristics, HBsAg screening, and LFT data during follow-up.
Results: Of 3,231 cases in the database, 810 were eligible. The overall HBsAg screening rate in the 5-year period was 27.7%. Screening rates were low from 2009-2012 (7.8-21%) and increased in 2013 to 82.9%. The prevalence of HBV among screened patients was 7.1%. Of those, 75% underwent prophylactic antiviral therapy. During the 6-month follow-up period, there were three cases of significant hepatitis caused by HBVr (4.2% of all significant hepatitis cases); all were in the unscreened group.
Conclusions: The prevalence of HBV in SOM patients undergoing CMT in our study was similar to the estimated prevalence in general Thai population, but the screening rate was quite low. Cases of HBVr causing significant hepatitis occurred in the unscreened group; therefore, HBV screening and treatment in SOM patients should be considered in HBV-endemic areas.

PMID: 31309773 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Assessment of physical functioning and handling of tiotropium/olodaterol Respimat® in patients with COPD in a real-world clinical setting.

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019;14:1441-1453

Authors: Steinmetz KO, Abenhardt B, Pabst S, Hänsel M, Kondla A, Bayer V, Buhl R

Abstract
Background: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) show signs of reduced physical activity from the early stages of the disease, impacting morbidity and mortality. Data suggest treatment with tiotropium, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist, and olodaterol, a long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA), as monotherapies and in combination, increases exercise capacity. This study assessed the effects of fixed-dose tiotropium/olodaterol (delivered via Respimat®) on physical function in Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease A-D patients requiring long-acting dual bronchodilation treatment in a real-world setting.
Methods: This open-label, single arm, noninterventional study measured changes in physical function in COPD patients treated with tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 μg for approximately 6 weeks (between Visit 1 [baseline] and Visit 2). Primary end point was therapeutic success, defined as a minimum 10-point increase in Physical Functioning Questionnaire (PF-10) score. Secondary end points included change in PF-10 from Visit 1 to Visit 2, the patient's general condition (measured by Physician's Global Evaluation score) at Visit 1 and Visit 2, and patient satisfaction with treatment delivered via the Respimat® device (assessed by Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire) at study end.
Results: Therapeutic success was observed in 51.5% of 1578 patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 49.0, 54.0) after approximately 6 weeks of treatment with tiotropium/olodaterol. Mean change in PF-10 score between Visit 1 and Visit 2 was 11.6 points (95% CI 10.7, 12.6). Patient general condition improved as indicated by a general improvement in scores between visits. Most patients were very satisfied or satisfied with tiotropium/olodaterol treatment (82.5%), inhalation (87.5%), and handling of Respimat® (85.2%). One percent of patients reported an investigator-defined drug-related adverse events (AE).
Conclusion: Tiotropium/olodaterol treatment improved physical functioning in COPD patients. An associated increase in patient general condition was observed. Most patients were very satisfied or satisfied with tiotropium/olodaterol treatment, inhaling, and handling of the Respimat® device. No unexpected drug-related AE occurred.

PMID: 31308649 [PubMed - in process]

Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir-rilpivirine for maintenance of virological suppression in adults with HIV-1: 100-week data from the randomised, open-label, phase 3 SWORD-1 and SWORD-2 studies.

Lancet HIV. 2019 Jul 12;:

Authors: Aboud M, Orkin C, Podzamczer D, Bogner JR, Baker D, Khuong-Josses MA, Parks D, Angelis K, Kahl LP, Blair EA, Adkison K, Underwood M, Matthews JE, Wynne B, Vandermeulen K, Gartland M, Smith K

Abstract
BACKGROUND: Primary analyses of the SWORD-1 and SWORD-2 trials at 48 weeks showed that switching to a two-drug regimen of dolutegravir plus rilpivirine was non-inferior to continuing a standard three-drug or four-drug antiretroviral regimen for maintenance of virological suppression in people with HIV-1. Here, we present efficacy and safety data from the 100-week analysis of the trials.
METHODS: SWORD-1 and SWORD-2 are identically designed, randomised, open-label phase 3 studies at 65 centres in 13 countries and 60 centres in 11 countries, respectively. Adults aged 18 years or older who were on a standard three-drug or four-drug antiretroviral therapy (ART) and had had fewer than 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL of plasma for at least 6 months were randomly assigned (1:1) to 50 mg dolutegravir plus 25 mg rilpivirine orally once daily (early-switch group) or to continue their standard regimen for 52 weeks before switching to the dolutegravir plus rilpivirine combination (ie, the late-switch group). In this analysis of week 100 data, the efficacy endpoint of interest was the proportion of participants with fewer than 50 copies of HIV-1 RNA per mL of plasma (per the US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm). This outcome was assessed in all randomly assigned participants who received at least one dose of the study drug. Data were analysed after the last participant completed week 100 (Sept 15, 2017) and verified through the data cutoff (Nov 21, 2017). SWORD-1 and SWORD-2 are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT02429791 and NCT02422797, respectively.
FINDINGS: 513 participants were randomly assigned to dolutegravir plus rilpivirine (ie, the early-switch group) and 511 to continue their standard ART regimen, 477 of whom then switched to dolutegravir plus rilpivirine at week 52 (ie, the late-switch group). At week 100, 456 (89% [95% CI 86-92]) of 513 participants in the early-switch group and 444 (93% [91-95]) of 477 in the late-switch group had fewer than 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL. Drug-related adverse events occurred in 103 (20%) participants in the early-switch group and 58 (12%) in the late-switch group. The most common drug-related adverse events were headache (11 participants in the early-switch group [2%] vs eight [2%] in the late-switch group) and nausea (eight [2%] vs five [1%]).
INTERPRETATION: The combination of dolutegravir plus rilpivirine sustained virological suppression of HIV-1, was associated with a low frequency of virological failure, and had a favourable safety profile, which support its use as a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-sparing and protease inhibitor-sparing alternative to three-drug regimens that reduces overall exposure to ART.
FUNDING: ViiV Healthcare and Janssen Pharmaceutica.

PMID: 31307948 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Management of adverse events associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Improving outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Cancer Treat Rev. 2019 Jul;77:20-28

Authors: Rimassa L, Danesi R, Pressiani T, Merle P

Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of primary liver cancer. Sorafenib, regorafenib, lenvatinib and cabozantinib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that target, in part, vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, and are approved in various regions of the world for the treatment of advanced HCC. All these agents are associated with a range of adverse events (AEs) that can have a substantial impact on patients' health-related quality of life. Fatigue, diarrhoea, hand-foot skin reaction, nausea, vomiting, decreased appetite, hypertension and weight loss are among the most common AEs experienced with these four TKIs. In this review, we discuss strategies for the management of these AEs in patients with advanced HCC, with the aim of maximizing treatment benefits and minimizing the need for TKI treatment discontinuation. We also consider potential TKI-drug interactions and discuss the use of TKIs in patients with liver dysfunction or who have experienced tumour recurrence after liver transplantation. Use of appropriate AE management strategies and avoidance of contraindicated drugs should help patients with advanced HCC to achieve optimal outcomes with TKIs.

PMID: 31195212 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Safety of cladribine tablets in the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis: An integrated analysis.

Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Apr;29:157-167

Authors: Cook S, Leist T, Comi G, Montalban X, Giovannoni G, Nolting A, Hicking C, Galazka A, Sylvester E

Abstract
BACKGROUND: Treating patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) with cladribine tablets (two times 4 or 5 days of treatment each year for 2 years) results in long-lasting efficacy, with continued stability in many patients for 4 or more years. Safety and tolerability outcomes from individual clinical studies with cladribine tablets have been reported previously.
OBJECTIVE: Report safety data from an integrated analysis of clinical trials and follow-up in patients with MS to further characterize the safety profile of cladribine tablets.
METHODS: Data for patients treated with cladribine tablets 10 mg (MAVENCLAD®; 3.5 mg/kg cumulative dose over 2 years, referred to as cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg) as monotherapy (n = 923) or placebo (n = 641) in Phase III clinical trials (CLARITY, CLARITY Extension and ORACLE-MS) and followed up in the PREMIERE registry were aggregated (Monotherapy Oral cohort). To better characterize rare events, additional data from earlier studies which involved the use of parenteral cladribine in patients with MS, and the ONWARD study, in which patients were given cladribine tablets in addition to interferon (IFN)-β or placebo plus IFN-β were included in an All Exposed cohort (cladribine, n = 1926; placebo, n = 802). Adjusted adverse events incidences per 100 patient-years (Adj-AE per 100 PY) were calculated for the integrated analyses.
RESULTS: The incidence rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the Monotherapy Oral cohort was 103.29 vs. 94.26 Adj-AEs per 100 PY for placebo. TEAEs that occurred more frequently with cladribine tablets were mainly driven by the TEAEs of lymphopenia (Adj-AE per 100 PY 7.94 vs. 1.06 for placebo) and lymphocyte count decreased (Adj-AE per 100 PY 0.78 vs. 0.10 for placebo) as anticipated due to the mode of action of cladribine. An increase in TEAE incidence rate was also observed in the cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg group vs. placebo for herpes zoster (Adj-AE per 100 PY 0.83 vs. 0.20, respectively). There were no cases of systemic, serious disseminated herpes zoster attributed to treatment with cladribine tablets. In general there was no increase in the risk of infections including opportunistic infections with cladribine tablets versus placebo, except for herpes zoster. Periods of severe lymphopenia (< 0.5 × 109 cells/L) were associated with an increased frequency of infections, but the nature of these was not different to that observed in the overall patient group treated with cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg. Within the constraints of a limited sample size, malignancy rates in the overall clinical program for cladribine in MS did not show evidence of an increase compared to placebo-treated patients and there was no increase in the incidence of malignancies over time in cladribine-treated patients.
CONCLUSION: The AE profile for cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg as a monotherapy has been well-characterized in a pooled population of patients from early to more advanced relapsing MS. There was no increased risk for infections in general except for a higher incidence of herpes zoster. Lymphopenia was amongst the most frequently observed TEAEs that occurred at a higher incidence with cladribine relative to placebo. There was also no increase in malignancy rates for cladribine relative to placebo.

PMID: 30885374 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Single-arm study to assess comprehensive infusion guidance for the prevention and management of the infusion associated reactions (IARs) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients treated with alemtuzumab (EMERALD).

Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Apr;29:7-14

Authors: Vukusic S, Brassat D, de Seze J, Izquierdo G, Lysandropoulos A, Moll W, Vanopdenbosch L, Arque MJ, Kertous M, Rufi P, Oreja-Guevara C

Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alemtuzumab is a humanized IgG monoclonal antibody approved in more than 60 countries for patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). In phase 2 and 3 clinical trials (CAMMS223 (NCT00050778), CARE-MS I (NCT00530348), and CARE-MS II (NCT00548405)), patients receiving alemtuzumab demonstrated significantly greater improvements on clinical and MRI outcomes versus SC IFNβ-1a; mild to moderate infusion-associated reactions (IARs) were the most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) associated with alemtuzumab. EMERALD (NCT02205489) was a phase 4, multicenter, multinational, single-arm study designed to assess an algorithm for the prevention and management of IARs in RRMS patients treated with alemtuzumab.
METHODS: Patients were treated with a study regimen of enhanced IAR prophylaxis relative to phase 2 and 3 studies. H1 and/or H2 antagonists or equivalent gastroprotection (proton pump inhibitors) were given 1 day before alemtuzumab infusion, 1 h prior to the infusion, and post-infusion. Methylprednisolone was given orally 1 day before infusion, 1 h prior to the infusion, and as needed post-infusion. Antipyretics were given 1 h before infusion and as needed post-infusion. Anti-emetics and normal saline were given as needed during and post-infusion.
RESULTS: Of the 61 patients screened, 58 (95.1%) were enrolled into the study. Of the 58 patients who received the first infusion of Period 1, 57 (98.3%) completed the 5 days of Course 1. A total of 54 patients received the first infusion of Period 2 and 53 completed the 3-day course. All patients (n = 58) completed the Month 6 visit and 54 the Month 12 visit. 93.1% of patients had at least one IAR (91.4% in Period 1 and 81.5% in Period 2), the majority of which were grade 1 (69.1%) or grade 2 (28.0%). The three most common IARs of headache, pyrexia, and rash occurred in 48.8%, 40.7%, and 24.1% of patients during the first course and 14.8%, 17.2%, and 5.6% of patients during the second course, respectively. The majority of IARs occurred within 6 h after the start of alemtuzumab infusion, with a peak during the first 2 h. The types and overall incidence of IARs were consistent with phase 2 and 3 trials. Frequency and distribution of rash were reduced in the EMERALD study compared with previous clinical trials. Serious IARs occurred in 15.5%, a higher rate than reported in clinical trials of alemtuzumab.
CONCLUSION: Although most alemtuzumab-treated patients experienced IARs as in previous controlled clinical studies, there was an improvement in the frequency and distribution of alemtuzumab-associated rash, which may have been associated with this study's prophylaxis regimen.

PMID: 30654246 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Bayesian optimal interval design with multiple toxicity constraints.

Biometrics. 2018 12;74(4):1320-1330

Authors: Lin R

Abstract
Most phase I dose-finding trials are conducted based on a single binary toxicity outcome to investigate the safety of new drugs. In many situations, however, it is important to distinguish between various toxicity types and different toxicity grades. By minimizing the maximum joint probability of incorrect decisions, we extend the Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design to control multiple toxicity outcomes at prespecified levels. The developed multiple-toxicity BOIN design can handle equally important, unequally important as well as nested toxicity outcomes. Interestingly, we find that the optimal interval boundaries with non-nested toxicity outcomes under the proposed method coincide with those under the standard single-toxicity BOIN design by treating the multiple toxicity outcomes marginally. We establish several desirable properties for the proposed interval design. We additionally extend our design to address trials with combined drugs. The finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is assessed according to extensive simulation studies and is compared with those of existing methods. Simulation results reveal that, our methods are as accurate and efficient as the more complicated model-based methods, but are more robust and much easier to implement.

PMID: 29870069 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

A randomised double blind placebo controlled phase 2 trial of adjunctive aspirin for tuberculous meningitis in HIV-uninfected adults.

Elife. 2018 02 27;7:

Authors: Mai NT, Dobbs N, Phu NH, Colas RA, Thao LT, Thuong NT, Nghia HD, Hanh NH, Hang NT, Heemskerk AD, Day JN, Ly L, Thu DD, Merson L, Kestelyn E, Wolbers M, Geskus R, Summers D, Chau NV, Dalli J, Thwaites GE

Abstract
Adjunctive dexamethasone reduces mortality from tuberculous meningitis (TBM) but not disability, which is associated with brain infarction. We hypothesised that aspirin prevents TBM-related brain infarction through its anti-thrombotic, anti-inflammatory, and pro-resolution properties. We conducted a randomised controlled trial in HIV-uninfected adults with TBM of daily aspirin 81 mg or 1000 mg, or placebo, added to the first 60 days of anti-tuberculosis drugs and dexamethasone (NCT02237365). The primary safety endpoint was gastro-intestinal or cerebral bleeding by 60 days; the primary efficacy endpoint was new brain infarction confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging or death by 60 days. Secondary endpoints included 8-month survival and neuro-disability; the number of grade 3 and 4 and serious adverse events; and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) inflammatory lipid mediator profiles. 41 participants were randomised to placebo, 39 to aspirin 81 mg/day, and 40 to aspirin 1000 mg/day between October 2014 and May 2016. TBM was proven microbiologically in 92/120 (76.7%) and baseline brain imaging revealed ≥1 infarct in 40/114 (35.1%) participants. The primary safety outcome occurred in 5/36 (13.9%) given placebo, and in 8/35 (22.9%) and 8/40 (20.0%) given 81 mg and 1000 mg aspirin, respectively (p=0.59). The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 11/38 (28.9%) given placebo, 8/36 (22.2%) given aspirin 81 mg, and 6/38 (15.8%) given 1000 mg aspirin (p=0.40). Planned subgroup analysis showed a significant interaction between aspirin treatment effect and diagnostic category (Pheterogeneity = 0.01) and suggested a potential reduction in new infarcts and deaths by day 60 in the aspirin treated participants with microbiologically confirmed TBM (11/32 (34.4%) events in placebo vs. 4/27 (14.8%) in aspirin 81 mg vs. 3/28 (10.7%) in aspirin 1000 mg; p=0.06). CSF analysis demonstrated aspirin dose-dependent inhibition of thromboxane A2 and upregulation of pro-resolving CSF protectins. The addition of aspirin to dexamethasone may improve outcomes from TBM and warrants investigation in a large phase 3 trial.

PMID: 29482717 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Combination of Deep Recurrent Neural Networks and Conditional Random Fields for Extracting Adverse Drug Reactions from User Reviews.

J Healthc Eng. 2017;2017:9451342

Authors: Tutubalina E, Nikolenko S

Abstract
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are an essential part of the analysis of drug use, measuring drug use benefits, and making policy decisions. Traditional channels for identifying ADRs are reliable but very slow and only produce a small amount of data. Text reviews, either on specialized web sites or in general-purpose social networks, may lead to a data source of unprecedented size, but identifying ADRs in free-form text is a challenging natural language processing problem. In this work, we propose a novel model for this problem, uniting recurrent neural architectures and conditional random fields. We evaluate our model with a comprehensive experimental study, showing improvements over state-of-the-art methods of ADR extraction.

PMID: 29177027 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Fentanyl-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with low dose of ketamine is not inferior to thoracic epidural analgesia for acute post-thoracotomy pain following video-assisted thoracic surgery: A randomized controlled study.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(28):e16403

Authors: Tseng WC, Lin WL, Lai HC, Huang TW, Chen PH, Wu ZF

Abstract
BACKGROUND: Thoracic epidural analgesia is the preferred method for postoperative analgesia following thoracic surgery. However, intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) may be an effective alternative. This study was conducted because few scientific reports exist comparing fentanyl-based IVPCA including a low dose of ketamine (fk-IVPCA) with thoracic patient-controlled epidural analgesia (t-PCEA) for the treatment of postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).
METHODS: This prospective, and randomized study included 70 patients randomized into fk-IVPCA and t-PCEA groups. Pain at rest and during movement, successful and unsuccessful triggers after pressing the PCA device button, the need for rescue analgesia, drug-related adverse events, and patient satisfaction were recorded for 48 hours postoperatively.
RESULTS: No significant differences in the intensity of pain at rest or during movement were observed between the 2 groups within 48 hours postoperatively. The number of unsuccessful PCA triggers in the t-PCEA group 0 to 4 hours after surgery was significantly higher than that in the fk-IVPCA group. However, the numbers of successful PCA triggers in the fk-IVPCA group at 4 to 12 and 0 to 24 hours after surgery were significantly higher than those in the t-PCEA group. The incidence of analgesic-related side effects and patient satisfaction were similar in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with t-PCEA, the addition of a subanesthetic dose of ketamine to fentanyl-based IVPCA resulted in similar pain control after VATS with no increase in the incidence of drug-related adverse effects. The results confirm that both multimodal intravenous analgesia and epidural analgesia can provide sufficient pain control and are safe strategies for treating acute post-thoracotomy pain.

PMID: 31305450 [PubMed - in process]

Efficacy and safety of apatinib in advanced sarcoma: an open-label, nonrandomized, single-center study of 45 patients.

Anticancer Drugs. 2019 Aug;30(7):e0778

Authors: Weitao Y, Fangxing W, Qiqing C, Jiaqiang W

Abstract
Sarcoma is a rare tumor with more than 50 histologic subtypes. Patients with advanced sarcoma have a poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib, an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 inhibitor, as salvage treatment for advanced bone and soft tissue sarcomas. From May 2017 to July 2018, a prospective, open-label, nonrandomized, clinical trial of apatinib was carried out in selected patients with advanced sarcoma. After apatinib dosing, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate, disease control rate, and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reviewed and evaluated. Patients were administered apatinib for at least 1 month. Median follow-up time was 6.00 months (1-13 months). The median PFS was 7.88 months, with the longest PFS of 13 months observed in a patient with epithelial sarcoma. The 3-month PFS rate was 66.44%. The median OS was 11.64 months with significant differences observed based on disease subtypes. Four patients achieved a partial response, and 36 patients achieved stable disease. The objective response rate was 8.88% (4/45), and the disease control rate was 88.89% (40/45). The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs were hypertension (12.50%), hand-foot syndrome (6.67%), diarrhea (12.50%), fatigue (6.25%), and proteinuria (14.29%). One drug-related severe AE of thrombocytopenia (21×10/l) occurred 2 months after therapy. Apatinib treatment in our study exhibited objective efficacy in PFS, OS, and manageable toxicity in patients with advanced sarcoma. This result supports future randomized controlled trials to further define apatinib activity in stage IV sarcomas.

PMID: 31305297 [PubMed - in process]

Safety of tiotropium Respimat® in black or African-American patients with symptomatic asthma.

Respir Med. 2019 Jul 02;155:58-60

Authors: Graham LM, Kerstjens HAM, Vogelberg C, Hamelmann E, Szefler SJ, Pisternick-Ruf W, Engel M, El Azzi G, Unseld A, Foggs MB

Abstract
BACKGROUND: Black patients with asthma have a higher disease burden and greater morbidity compared with other racial/ethnic groups. Tiotropium Respimat®, as add-on to at least inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), improves lung function and asthma control and reduces asthma exacerbation risk in patients, with a safety profile comparable with placebo. This study aimed to assess the safety of tiotropium Respimat®, compared with placebo, in black or African-American patients.
METHODS: Data were pooled from 12 randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, Phase II or III trials from the global Boehringer Ingelheim program with once-daily tiotropium Respimat® (5 μg or 2.5 μg). Trial participants had symptomatic persistent asthma with a broad range of severities and were aged 1-75 years. The safety results of black or African-American patients were compared with the overall trial population.
RESULTS: Of the 5165 patients treated with tiotropium or placebo, 3.2% were black or African American. For both doses of tiotropium, the proportion of patients reporting adverse events (AEs) was approximately 10% lower compared with placebo and was generally comparable with the proportion of patients reporting AEs in all groups of the overall population. The number of investigator-assessed drug-related AEs, AEs leading to trial drug discontinuation or serious AEs reported by patients was low and comparable between treatment groups and with the overall population.
CONCLUSION: Tiotropium Respimat® appears to be a generally safe add-on bronchodilator treatment option to ICS with or without other controllers in pediatric and adult black or African-American patients with asthma.
CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIERS: NCT01634113, NCT01634139, NCT01634152, NCT01257230, NCT01277523, NCT01316380, NCT00350207, NCT01172808, NCT01172821, NCT01340209, NCT00772538, NCT00776984.

PMID: 31302579 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Efficacy and safety of interferon-free regimens in patients affected by chronic hepatitis C and psychiatric disorders.

J Infect Chemother. 2019 Jul 10;:

Authors: Boglione L, Lupia T, Cariti G, Di Perri G

Abstract
The presence of psychiatric disorders (PD) in patients affected by chronic hepatitis C (CHC) was a major contraindication for the treatment with interferon (IFN)-based regimens. The novel IFN-free approach using the direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) is an interesting and promising chance for these subjects. In this retrospective analysis we focused the attention on the virological response and safety of CHC patients affected by PD and treated with IFN-free regimens. 136 subjects were enrolled in this study. Treatment naïve were 78 (57.3), experienced 58 (42.6%). Major depression was present in 25 patients (18.4%), anxiety disorders in 37 (27.2%), bipolar disorders in 23 (16.9%), schizophrenia in 17 (12.5%), behavioral disturbance in 21 (15.4%), psychosis in 13 (9.5%). Psychoactive medication taken by patients were: benzodiazepines (n = 29, 21.3%), antidepressants (n = 24, 17.6%), neuroleptics (n = 29, 21.3%), mood stabilizers (n = 19, 14%), combinations of different drugs (n = 17, 12.5%). Sustained virological response at 12 weeks of follow-up (SVR12) was observed in 128 patients (94.1%), drop-out were 3 (2.2%). No adverse events or significant drug-related side-effects were reported. The treatment with novel IFN-free therapies against CHC were higher effective and well tolerated also in patients with PD taking psychoactive medications.

PMID: 31301972 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]