Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Jun 5;9:14. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19324.2. eCollection 2024.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mortality associated with HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis remains high even in the context of clinical trials (24-45% at 10 weeks); mortality at 12-months is up to 78% in resource limited settings. Co-prevalent tuberculosis (TB) is common and preventable, and likely contributes to poor patient outcomes. Innovative strategies to increase TB preventative therapy (TPT) provision and uptake within this high-risk group are needed.

PROTOCOL: The IMPROVE trial (Integrated management of cryptococcal meningitis and concurrent opportunistic infections to improve outcomes in advanced HIV disease) is a nested open label, two arm, randomised controlled strategy trial to evaluate the safety (adverse events) and feasibility (adherence and tolerability) of two ultra-short course TPT strategies, in the context of recent diagnosis and treatment for cryptococcal meningitis. We will enrol 205 adults with HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis from three hospitals in Uganda. Participants will be randomised to either inpatient initiation (early) or outpatient initiation (standard, week 6) of 1HP (one month of isoniazid and rifapentine). Participant follow-up is to include TB screening, 1HP pill counts and tolerability reviews on alternate weeks until week-18. The trial primary endpoint is TB-disease free 1HP treatment completion at 18-weeks, secondary endpoints: 1HP treatment completion, 1HP discontinuation, grade ≥3 adverse events and serious adverse events, drug-induced liver injury, incident active TB, 18-week survival; rifapentine, fluconazole and dolutegravir concentrations will be measured with intensive sampling in a pharmacokinetic sub-study of 15 eligible participants.

DISCUSSION: The IMPROVE trial will provide preliminary safety and feasibility data to inform 1HP TPT strategies for adults with advanced HIV disease and cryptococcal meningitis. The potential impact of demonstrating that inpatient initiation of 1HP TPT is safe and feasible amongst this high-risk subpopulation with advanced HIV disease, would be to expand the range of clinical encounters in which clinicians can feasibly provide 1HP, and therefore increase the reach of TPT as a preventative intervention.

ISRCTN REGISTRATION: ISRCTN18437550 (05/11/2021).

PMID:38854693 | PMC:PMC11157187 | DOI:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19324.2

Cureus. 2024 May 9;16(5):e59975. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59975. eCollection 2024 May.

ABSTRACT

The pharmacovigilance program of India (PvPI), after its inception, has been reliably acquiring force in bringing issues to light among the masses, healthcare professionals, the pharma industry, and clinical staff at hospitals. Adverse drug reactions are unintended events that occur after exposure to a drug, biological product, or medical device, and they may result in morbidity and mortality. It is critical to monitor the safety of drugs during the post-marketing phase to find long-term and rare ADRs, as well as ADRs in special populations and patients with co-morbidities that are not usually included during clinical trials. The definitive objective of pharmacovigilance is to collate data and analyze it. Assessing the causality between ADRs and drugs is necessary to decrease the occurrence of ADRs and to reduce the risk of drug-related ADRs. ADRs may lead to increased morbidity, increased hospital stays, and increased cost of treatment, resulting in compromised patient safety. Causality assessment is the evaluation of the likelihood that a particular treatment is the cause of an observed adverse event and establishing a causal association between a drug and a drug reaction is necessary to prevent further recurrences. Numerous methods available for establishing a causal association between the drug and adverse events have been broadly classified into clinical judgment or global introspection, algorithms, and probabilistic methods. These include the Swedish method, World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) scale, Naranjo's algorithm, Kramer algorithm, Jones algorithm, Karch algorithm, Bégaud algorithm, Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee guidelines, Bayesian Adverse Reaction Diagnostic Instrument, and so on. Despite various methods available, none of the causality assessment tools have been universally accepted as the gold standard. Naranjo's algorithm and WHO-UMC scales are, however, the most commonly used. Similarly, for preventability and severity assessment of ADRs, the Schumock and Thornton scale and Hartwig and Siegel's scale are most commonly used. Hence, we reviewed different tools and methods available to assess the causality, preventability, and severity of ADRs.

PMID:38854273 | PMC:PMC11162198 | DOI:10.7759/cureus.59975

Lancet Oncol. 2024 Jun 6:S1470-2045(24)00203-1. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00203-1. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: PD-1 blockade is highly efficacious for mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer in both metastatic and neoadjuvant settings. We aimed to explore the activity and safety of neoadjuvant therapy with PD-1 blockade plus an angiogenesis inhibitor and the feasibility of organ preservation in patients with locally advanced mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer.

METHODS: We initiated a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial (NEOCAP) at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and the Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China. Patients aged 18-75 years with untreated mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high or POLE/POLD1-mutated locally advanced colorectal cancer (cT3 or N+ for rectal cancer, and T3 with invasion ≥5mm or T4, with or without N+ for colon cancer) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0-1 were enrolled and given 200 mg camrelizumab intravenously on day 1 and 250 mg apatinib orally from day 1-14, every 3 weeks for 3 months followed by surgery or 6 months if patients did not have surgery. Patients who had a clinical complete response did not undergo surgery and proceeded with a watch-and-wait approach. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a pathological or clinical complete response. Eligible enrolled patients who received at least one cycle of neoadjuvant treatment and had at least one tumour response assessment following the baseline assessment were included in the activity analysis, and patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the safety analysis. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04715633) and is ongoing.

FINDINGS: Between Sept 29, 2020, and Dec 15, 2022, 53 patients were enrolled; one patient was excluded from the activity analysis because they were found to be mismatch repair-proficient and microsatellite-stable. 23 (44%) patients were female and 29 (56%) were male. The median follow-up was 16·4 (IQR 10·5-23·5) months. 28 (54%; 95% CI 35-68) patients had a clinical complete response and 24 of these patients were managed with a watch-and-wait approach, including 20 patients with colon cancer and multiple primary colorectal cancer. 23 (44%) of 52 patients underwent surgery for the primary tumour, and 14 (61%; 95% CI 39-80) had a pathological complete response. 38 (73%; 95% CI 59-84) of 52 patients had a complete response. Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 20 (38%) of 53 patients; the most common were increased aminotransferase (six [11%]), bowel obstruction (four [8%]), and hypertension (four [8%]). Drug-related serious adverse events occurred in six (11%) of 53 patients. One patient died from treatment-related immune-related hepatitis.

INTERPRETATION: Neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus apatinib show promising antitumour activity in patients with locally advanced mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer. Immune-related adverse events should be monitored with the utmost vigilance. Organ preservation seems promising not only in patients with rectal cancer, but also in those with colon cancer who have a clinical complete response. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the oncological outcomes of the watch-and-wait approach.

FUNDING: The National Natural Science Foundation of China, Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, and the Cancer Innovative Research Program of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center.

TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

PMID:38852601 | DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00203-1

Mol Inform. 2024 Jun;43(6):e202400021. doi: 10.1002/minf.202400021. Epub 2024 Jun 8.

ABSTRACT

Drug development is a long and costly process, often limited by the toxicity and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) caused by drug candidates. Even on the market, some drugs can cause strong ADRs that can vary depending on an individual polymorphism. The development of Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) allowed the discovery of genetic variants of interest that may cause these effects. In this study, the objective was to investigate a deep learning approach to predict genetic variations potentially related to ADRs. We used single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) information from dbSNP to create a network based on ADR-drug-target-mutations and extracted matrixes of interaction to build deep Neural Networks (DNN) models. Considering only information about mutations known to impact drug efficacy and drug safety from PharmGKB and drug adverse reactions based on the MedDRA System Organ Classes (SOCs), these DNN models reached a balanced accuracy of 0.61 in average. Including molecular fingerprints representing structural features of the drugs did not improve the performance of the models. To our knowledge, this is the first model that exploits DNN to predict ADR-drug-target-mutations. Although some improvements are suggested, these models can be of interest to analyze multiple compounds over all of the genes and polymorphisms information accessible and thus pave the way in precision medicine.

PMID:38850150 | DOI:10.1002/minf.202400021

Mol Inform. 2024 Jun;43(6):e202300312. doi: 10.1002/minf.202300312. Epub 2024 Jun 8.

ABSTRACT

Pregnant females may use medications to manage health problems that develop during pregnancy or that they had prior to pregnancy. However, using medications during pregnancy has a potential risk to the fetus. Assessing the fetotoxicity of drugs is essential to ensure safe treatments, but the current process is challenged by ethical issues, time, and cost. Therefore, the need for in silico models to efficiently assess the fetotoxicity of drugs has recently emerged. Previous studies have proposed successful machine learning models for fetotoxicity prediction and even suggest molecular substructures that are possibly associated with fetotoxicity risks or protective effects. However, the interpretation of the decisions of the models on fetotoxicity prediction for each drug is still insufficient. This study constructed machine learning-based models that can predict the fetotoxicity of drugs while providing explanations for the decisions. For this, permutation feature importance was used to identify the general features that the model made significant in predicting the fetotoxicity of drugs. In addition, features associated with fetotoxicity for each drug were analyzed using the attention mechanism. The predictive performance of all the constructed models was significantly high (AUROC: 0.854-0.974, AUPR: 0.890-0.975). Furthermore, we conducted literature reviews on the predicted important features and found that they were highly associated with fetotoxicity. We expect that our model will benefit fetotoxicity research by providing an evaluation of fetotoxicity risks for drugs or drug candidates, along with an interpretation of that prediction.

PMID:38850133 | DOI:10.1002/minf.202300312

Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2024 Jun 6:107235. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107235. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nemonoxacin malate is a novel non-fluorinated quinolone for oral and intravenous (IV) administration. This phase 3 multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-controlled clinical trial (NCT02205112) evaluated the efficacy and safety of IV nemonoxacin versus levofloxacin for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adult patients.

METHODS: The eligible patients were randomised to receive 500 mg nemonoxacin or levofloxacin via IV infusion, once daily for 7-14 days. The primary endpoint was the clinical cure rate at test of cure (TOC) visit in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population. The efficacy and safety were also compared between nemonoxacin and levofloxacin in terms of secondary efficacy and safety endpoints.

RESULTS: Overall, 525 patients were randomised and treated with nemonoxacin (n=349) or levofloxacin (n=176). The clinical cure rate was 91.8% (279/304) for nemonoxacin and 85.7% (138/161) for levofloxacin in the mITT population (P> 0.05). The clinical efficacy of nemonoxacin was noninferior to levofloxacin in treatment of CAP. Nemonoxacin achieved microbiological success rate of 88.8% (95/107), while levofloxacin achieved 87.8% (43/49) (P > 0.05) at TOC visit in the bacteriological mITT population. The incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) was 37.1% in nemonoxacin group and 22.2% in levofloxacin group, mostly local reactions at the infusion site, nausea, elevated ALT/AST, and QT interval prolongation. The nemonoxacin-related AEs were mostly mild and resolved after discontinuation of nemonoxacin.

CONCLUSIONS: Nemonoxacin 500 mg IV once daily for 7-14 days is effective and safe and noninferior to levofloxacin for treating CAP in adult patients.

PMID:38851462 | DOI:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107235

Age Ageing. 2024 Jun 1;53(6):afae116. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae116.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Problematic polypharmacy is the prescribing of five or more medications potentially inappropriately. Unintentional prescribing cascades represent an under-researched aspect of problematic polypharmacy and occur when an adverse drug reaction (ADR) is misinterpreted as a new symptom resulting in the initiation of a new medication. The aim of this study was to elicit key stakeholders' perceptions of and attitudes towards problematic polypharmacy, with a focus on prescribing cascades.

METHODS: qualitative one-to-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with predefined key stakeholder groups. Inductive thematic analysis was employed.

RESULTS: Thirty-one stakeholders were interviewed: six patients, two carers, seven general practitioners, eight pharmacists, four hospital doctors, two professional organisation representatives and two policymakers. Three main themes were identified: (i) ADRs and prescribing cascades-a necessary evil. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) expressed concern that experiencing an ADR would negatively impact patients' confidence in their doctor. However, patients viewed ADRs pragmatically as an unpredictable risk. (ii) Balancing the risk/benefit tipping point. The complexity of prescribing decisions in the context of polypharmacy made balancing this tipping point challenging. Consequently, HCPs avoided medication changes. (iii) The minefield of medication reconciliation. Stakeholders, including patients and carers, viewed medication reconciliation as a perilous activity due to systemic communication deficits.

CONCLUSION: Stakeholders believed that at a certain depth of polypharmacy, the risk that a new symptom is being caused by an existing medication becomes incalculable. Therefore, in the absence of harm, medication changes were avoided. However, medication reconciliation post hospital discharge compelled prescribing decisions and was seen as a high-risk activity by stakeholders.

PMID:38851215 | DOI:10.1093/ageing/afae116

Lancet. 2024 Jun 5:S0140-6736(24)00701-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00701-3. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are currently no standard first-line treatment options for patients with higher grade 2-3, well-differentiated, advanced, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of first-line [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE (177Lu-Dotatate) treatment.

METHODS: NETTER-2 was an open-label, randomised, parallel-group, superiority, phase 3 trial. We enrolled patients (aged ≥15 years) with newly diagnosed higher grade 2 (Ki67 ≥10% and ≤20%) and grade 3 (Ki67 >20% and ≤55%), somatostatin receptor-positive (in all target lesions), advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours from 45 centres across nine countries in North America, Europe, and Asia. We used interactive response technologies to randomly assign (2:1) patients to receive four cycles (cycle interval was 8 weeks ± 1 week) of intravenous 177Lu-Dotatate plus intramuscular octreotide 30 mg long-acting repeatable (LAR) then octreotide 30 mg LAR every 4 weeks (177Lu-Dotatate group) or high-dose octreotide 60 mg LAR every 4 weeks (control group), stratified by neuroendocrine tumour grade (2 vs 3) and origin (pancreas vs other). Tumour assessments were done at baseline, week 16, and week 24, and then every 12 weeks until disease progression or death. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by blinded, independent, central radiology assessment. We did the primary analysis at 101 progression-free survival events as the final progression-free survival analysis. NETTER-2 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03972488, and is active and not recruiting.

FINDINGS: Between Jan 22, 2020, and Oct 13, 2022, we screened 261 patients, 35 (13%) of whom were excluded. We randomly assigned 226 (87%) patients (121 [54%] male and 105 [46%] female) to the 177Lu-Dotatate group (n=151 [67%]) and control group (n=75 [33%]). Median progression-free survival was 8·5 months (95% CI 7·7-13·8) in the control group and 22·8 months (19·4-not estimated) in the 177Lu-Dotatate group (stratified hazard ratio 0·276 [0·182-0·418]; p<0·0001). During the treatment period, adverse events (of any grade) occurred in 136 (93%) of 147 treated patients in the 177Lu-Dotatate group and 69 (95%) of 73 treated patients in the control group. There were no study drug-related deaths during the treatment period.

INTERPRETATION: First-line 177Lu-Dotatate plus octreotide LAR significantly extended median progression-free survival (by 14 months) in patients with grade 2 or 3 advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. 177Lu-Dotatate should be considered a new standard of care in first-line therapy in this population.

FUNDING: Advanced Accelerator Applications, a Novartis Company.

PMID:38851203 | DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00701-3

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Apr 17;86(6):3530-3534. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002058. eCollection 2024 Jun.

ABSTRACT

This article discusses the prevalence and impact of pharmacologically-induced mydriasis, a condition where the pupil becomes excessively dilated due to certain drugs. It highlights the challenges faced by medical professionals in dealing with this condition and the limitations of current treatments, like pilocarpine and dapiprazole, which come with systemic side effects and specific contraindications, limiting their regular use. The article introduces Ryzumvi, a novel ophthalmic solution approved by the US FDA, which effectively reverses mydriasis caused by adrenergic agonists and antimuscarinic drugs. The article provides insights into its mechanism of action, clinical efficacy, pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerance based on extensive clinical trials. It emphasizes its rapid onset of action and effectiveness in restoring pupils to their initial size. It also underlines the potential for expanded applications, including in pediatric patients, solidifying its importance in the field of ophthalmology. Furthermore, Ryzumvi represents a promising advancement in managing pharmacologically-induced mydriasis, offering swift and effective relief while highlighting the importance of adhering to safety precautions and the continuous research and development efforts in ophthalmology to comprehensively address vision-related disorders and enhance patient outcomes.

PMID:38846833 | PMC:PMC11152829 | DOI:10.1097/MS9.0000000000002058

Toxicon. 2024 Jul;245:107787. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2024.107787. Epub 2024 Jun 4.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Medicines derived from natural sources have been used for thousands of years throughout the world. Because natural compounds are thought to have less toxic effects and fewer side effects, these products are becoming more popular by the day.

CASE REPORT: In this case report, we presented a case of acute kidney injury, rhabdomyolysis, and hepatotoxicity after ingestion of black seed oil. Although black seed oil is widely used around the world, there is currently limited knowledge on its adverse effects.

CONCLUSION: It is important to keep in mind that rhabdomyolysis, acute renal damage, and hepatotoxicity might occur following the use of black seed oil. Black seed oil ingestion should be considered when making a differential diagnosis for these conditions in patients suspected of taking herbal products.

PMID:38844000 | DOI:10.1016/j.toxicon.2024.107787

Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2024 Jun 6:ejhpharm-2024-004124. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004124. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a serious complication in patients treated with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between SGLT2i and the risk of DKA, and to identify high-risk groups and characteristics that should be emphasised.

METHODS: A retrospective case series study was conducted to collect medical records of inpatients diagnosed with DKA and using SGLT2i before the onset of the disease from September 2022 to September 2023 in a tertiary hospital in Shanghai. Cases that met the inclusion criteria were retrieved through the electronic medical record system. Information was collected to compare the risk of DKA in patients with different characteristics.

RESULTS: A total of 21 patients (12 men and 9 women) met the criteria for SGLT2i-associated DKA. The mean diabetes duration was 10.4 years, with 47.6% (10/21) of patients diagnosed with euglycaemic DKA. The drug treatment regimen most commonly used was the combination of SGLT2i and metformin, representing 52.4% (11/21) of cases. The most common clinical symptoms were nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and malaise. Common predisposing factors were acute infections, acute pancreatitis (predominantly hyperlipidaemic type), dietary inappropriateness, acute cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and surgery. 71.4% of patients (15/21) had multiple risk factors.

CONCLUSION: The use of SGLT2i in diabetic patients is associated with an increased risk of DKA, particularly in the presence of predisposing factors such as infection. Furthermore, long diabetes duration, decreased pancreatic β-cell function and the combined use of metformin may also contribute to the risk of DKA in patients treated with SGLT2i. The findings of this study provide valuable insights for better identification and management of DKA risks associated with SGLT2i in clinical practice.

PMID:38844329 | DOI:10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004124

Lancet. 2024 May 31:S0140-6736(24)00885-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00885-7. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is a locally aggressive neoplasm for which few systemic treatment options exist. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of vimseltinib, an oral, switch-control, CSF1R inhibitor, in patients with symptomatic TGCT not amenable to surgery.

METHODS: MOTION is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done in 35 specialised hospitals in 13 countries. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of TGCT for which surgical resection could potentially worsen functional limitation or cause severe morbidity. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) with interactive response technology to vimseltinib (30 mg orally twice weekly) or placebo, administrated in 28-day cycles for 24 weeks. Patients and site personnel were masked to treatment assignment until week 25, unless progressive disease was confirmed earlier. The primary endpoint was objective response rate by independent radiological review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST) at week 25 in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received the study drug. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05059262, and enrolment is complete.

FINDINGS: Between Jan 21, 2022, and Feb 21, 2023, 123 patients were randomly assigned (83 to vimseltinib and 40 to placebo). 73 (59%) patients were female and 50 (41%) were male. Nine (11%) of 83 patients assigned to vimseltinib and five (13%) of 40 patients assigned to placebo discontinued treatment before week 25; one patient in the placebo group did not receive any study drug. Objective response rate per RECIST was 40% (33 of 83 patients) in the vimseltinib group vs 0% (none of 40) in the placebo group (difference 40% [95% CI 29-51]; p<0·0001). Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were grade 1 or 2; the only grade 3 or 4 TEAE that occurred in more than 5% of patients receiving vimseltinib was increased blood creatine phosphokinase (eight [10%] of 83). One patient in the vimseltinib group had a treatment-related serious TEAE of subcutaneous abscess. No evidence of cholestatic hepatotoxicity or drug-induced liver injury was noted.

INTERPRETATION: Vimseltinib produced a significant objective response rate and clinically meaningful functional and symptomatic improvement in patients with TGCT, providing an effective treatment option for these patients.

FUNDING: Deciphera Pharmaceuticals.

PMID:38843860 | DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00885-7

PLoS One. 2024 Jun 6;19(6):e0303450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303450. eCollection 2024.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The MIMIX platform is a novel microneedle array patch (MAP) characterized by slowly dissolving microneedle tips that deploy into the dermis following patch application. We describe safety, reactogenicity, tolerability and immunogenicity for MIMIX MAP vaccination against influenza.

METHODOLOGY: The trial was a Phase 1, exploratory, first-in-human, parallel randomized, rater, participant, study analyst-blinded, placebo-controlled study in Canada. Forty-five healthy participants (18 to 39 years of age, inclusive) were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either 15 μg or 7.5 μg of an H1N1 influenza vaccine, or placebo delivered via MIMIX MAP to the volar forearm. A statistician used a computer program to create a randomization scheme with a block size of 3. Post-treatment follow-up was approximately 180 days. Primary safety outcomes included the incidence of study product related serious adverse events and unsolicited events within 180 days, solicited application site and systemic reactogenicity through 7 days after administration and solicited application site erythema and/or pigmentation 14, 28, 56 and 180 days after administration. Immunogenicity outcomes included antibody titers and percentage of seroconversion (SCR) and seroprotection (SPR) rates determined by the hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay. Exploratory outcomes included virus microneutralization (MN) titers, durability and breadth of the immune response. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT06125717.

FINDINGS: Between July 7, 2022 and March 13, 2023 45 participants were randomized to a treatment group. One participant was lost to follow up in the 15 μg group and 1 participant withdrew from the 7.5 μg dose group. Safety analyses included n = 15 per group, immunogenicity analyses included n = 14 for the 15 μg and 7.5 μg treatment groups and n = 15 for the placebo group. No SAEs were reported in any of the treatment groups. All treatment groups reported solicited local events within 7 days after vaccination, with mild (Grade 1) erythema being the most frequent symptom reported. Other local symptoms reported included mostly mild (Grade 1) induration/swelling, itching, pigmentation, skin flaking, and tenderness. Within 7 days after vaccination, 2 participants (4.4%) reported moderate (Grade 2) erythema, 1 participant (2.2%) reported moderate (Grade 2) induration/swelling, and 1 participant (2.2%) reported moderate (Grade 2) itching. There was an overall reduction in erythema and pigmentation reported on Days 15, 29, 57, and 180 among all treatment groups. Systemic symptoms reported within 7 days after vaccination, included mild (Grade 1) fatigue reported among all treatment groups, and mild (Grade 1) headache reported by 1 participant in the 7.5 μg treatment group. No study drug related severe symptoms were reported in the study. Group mean fold rises in HAI titers ranged between 8.7 and 12-fold, SCRs were >76% and SPRs were >92% for both VX-103 dose groups thereby fulfilling serological criteria established by the EMA and FDA for seasonal influenza vaccines. Longitudinal assessments demonstrate persistence of the immune response through at least Day 180.

CONCLUSIONS: The MIMIX MAP platform is safe, well tolerated and elicits robust antibody responses.

PMID:38843267 | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0303450

PLoS One. 2024 Jun 6;19(6):e0302287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302287. eCollection 2024.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The pharmacist plays an essential role in identifying and managing drug-related problems. The aim of this research was to assess the costs avoided by clinical pharmacist interventions to resolve drug-related problems.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Clinical pharmacists identified drug-related problems and interventions to address them in consecutive outpatients visiting internal medicine clinics at major teaching and public hospitals in Jordan from September 2012 to December 2013. The costs avoided by each intervention to address drug-related problems were collected from the literature. The collected data were used to calculate the overall cost saved and avoided by the interventions implemented to address the identified drug-related problems, adopting a Jordanian healthcare system perspective.

RESULTS: A total of 2747 patients were enrolled in the study. Diagnostic interventions, such as the need for additional diagnostic testing, were employed in 95.07% of the 13935 intervention to address the drug-related problem "Miscellaneous" which was the most frequent drug-related problems. Other common drug-related problems categories included inappropriate knowledge (n = 6972), inappropriate adherence (4447), efficacy-related drug-related problem (3395) and unnecessary drug therapy (1082). The total cost avoided over the research period was JOD 1418720 per month and total cost saved over the study period was JOD 17250.204. Drug-related problems were associated the number of prescription medications (odds ratio = 1.105; 95% confidence interval = 1.069-1.142), prescribed gastrointestinal drugs (3.485; 2.86-4.247), prescribed antimicrobials (3.326; 1.084-10.205), and prescribed musculoskeletal drugs (1.385; 1.011-1.852).

CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed that pharmacists have provided cognitive input to rationalize and optimize the medication use and prevent errors, that led to the reported projected avoided and saved expenditures via various interventions to address drug-related problems. This highlights the added economic impact to the clinical impact of drug-related problems on patients and the healthcare system. The high prevalence and cost of drug-related problems offer strong rationale for pharmacists to provide more vigilant intervention to improve patient outcomes while maintaining cost effectiveness.

PMID:38843244 | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0302287

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 6;26:e50274. doi: 10.2196/50274.

ABSTRACT

Adverse drug reactions are a common cause of morbidity in health care. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) evaluates individual case safety reports of adverse events (AEs) after submission to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System as part of its surveillance activities. Over the past decade, the FDA has explored the application of artificial intelligence (AI) to evaluate these reports to improve the efficiency and scientific rigor of the process. However, a gap remains between AI algorithm development and deployment. This viewpoint aims to describe the lessons learned from our experience and research needed to address both general issues in case-based reasoning using AI and specific needs for individual case safety report assessment. Beginning with the recognition that the trustworthiness of the AI algorithm is the main determinant of its acceptance by human experts, we apply the Diffusion of Innovations theory to help explain why certain algorithms for evaluating AEs at the FDA were accepted by safety reviewers and others were not. This analysis reveals that the process by which clinicians decide from case reports whether a drug is likely to cause an AE is not well defined beyond general principles. This makes the development of high performing, transparent, and explainable AI algorithms challenging, leading to a lack of trust by the safety reviewers. Even accounting for the introduction of large language models, the pharmacovigilance community needs an improved understanding of causal inference and of the cognitive framework for determining the causal relationship between a drug and an AE. We describe specific future research directions that underpin facilitating implementation and trust in AI for drug safety applications, including improved methods for measuring and controlling of algorithmic uncertainty, computational reproducibility, and clear articulation of a cognitive framework for causal inference in case-based reasoning.

PMID:38842929 | DOI:10.2196/50274

Infection. 2024 Jun 6. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02248-3. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore adverse event (AE) signals of Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

METHODS: AE reports primarily associated with CZA were retrieved from the FAERS database from the second quarter of 2015 to the second quarter of 2023. Signal detection was conducted using the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) methods.

RESULTS: A total of 750 AEs reports with CZA as the preferred suspected drug were obtained, identifying 66 preferred terms (PTs) involving 24 system organ classes (SOCs). Besides, the AEs already mentioned in the drug label, this study also revealed some new, clinically valuable potential AEsignals, such as Cholestasis (n = 14, ROR 29.39, PRR 29.15, IC 3.34, EBGM 29.11), Drug-induced liver injury (n = 8, ROR 9.05, PRR 9.01, IC 2.25, EBGM 9.01), Hepatocellular injury (n = 7, ROR 13.90, PRR 13.84, IC 2.41, EBGM 13.63), Haemolytic anaemia (n = 5, ROR 24.29, PRR 24.22, IC 2.42, EBGM 40.53), etc. Additionally, AE signals with higher intensity were identified, such as Hypernatraemia (n = 5, ROR 40.73, PRR 40.61, IC 2.31, EBGM 24.19), Toxic epidermal necrolysis (n = 4, ROR 11.58, PRR 11.55, IC 1.89, EBGM 11.54). Therefore, special vigilance for these potential AEs is warranted when using CZA clinically.

CONCLUSION: This study highlights the potential AEs and risks associated with the clinical use of CZA, particularly the risks related to Cholestasis, Drug-induced liver injury, Haemolytic anaemia, Hypernatraemia, and Toxic epidermal necrolysis.

PMID:38842750 | DOI:10.1007/s15010-024-02248-3

Am J Dermatopathol. 2024 Jun 6. doi: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000002750. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Enfortumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against nectin-4 and, when combined with vedotin, is an antibody-drug conjugate approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancers. A 75-year-old woman with stage IV papillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder who completed cycle 2 of enfortumab vedotin (EV) infusions presented to our dermatology department for new-onset symmetric and painful dusky erythematous patches on the extremities and trunk without mucosal involvement. Two biopsies were obtained, which revealed an interface dermatitis with notable ring mitoses within the basal and suprabasal layers of the epidermis without epidermal necrosis. The patient was diagnosed with toxic erythema of chemotherapy and improved with application of triamcinolone 0.1% ointment twice daily without discontinuation of her EV infusions. Although a targeted therapy, EV commonly exhibits cutaneous side effects due to the expression of nectin-4 in the skin. Most cutaneous side effects are mild and can be managed symptomatically. However, severe drug-induced eruptions, such as toxic epidermal necrolysis, have been described. The histologic findings of EV associated skin eruptions can aid in correctly identifying the culprit drug and assist in management. This case provides insights for dermatologists by highlighting the common cutaneous side effects of EV and the associated histologic findings as this targeted therapy becomes increasingly utilized in the treatment of refractory neoplasms.

PMID:38842397 | DOI:10.1097/DAD.0000000000002750

Cureus. 2024 May 6;16(5):e59718. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59718. eCollection 2024 May.

ABSTRACT

Gliadel wafer implants (Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA) have shown their efficacy in prolonging survival in patients with malignant gliomas. The safety of Gliadel wafers has also been reported; however, there is a certain risk of adverse events. We present a rare case of refractory cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage with eosinophilic meningitis in a patient with glioblastoma who underwent tumor resection with Gliadel wafer implants. A 60-year-old man presented with a glioblastoma in the right temporal lobe. The patient underwent tumor resection with Gliadel wafer implants. During the postoperative course, the patient presented with intractable CSF leakage and the development of a pseudomeningocele. A delayed rise in blood and CSF eosinophil count (a few weeks after the primary operation) and positive drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST) results against the Gliadel wafer led to the diagnosis of an allergic reaction to these implants. Removal of the Gliadel wafers resolved the eosinophilic reaction; however, the patient subsequently required a shunt procedure for persistent hydrocephalus. This case highlights the importance of investigating rare causes of refractory CSF leakage and hydrocephalus due to allergic reactions to Gliadel wafers. Delayed elevations of eosinophils in blood and CSF tests may lead to a diagnosis of eosinophilic meningitis. DLST against Gliadel wafers is also useful for diagnosis when it is available. To control the hydrocephalus, not only the shunt procedure but also wafer removal must be considered; however, patients with limited life expectancy are generally hesitant to undergo such additional procedures.

PMID:38841004 | PMC:PMC11151347 | DOI:10.7759/cureus.59718

Drug Ther Bull. 2024 Jun 5:dtb-2024-000037. doi: 10.1136/dtb.2024.000037. Online ahead of print.

NO ABSTRACT

PMID:38839266 | DOI:10.1136/dtb.2024.000037

Drug Ther Bull. 2024 Jun 5:dtb-2024-000036. doi: 10.1136/dtb.2024.000036. Online ahead of print.

NO ABSTRACT

PMID:38839265 | DOI:10.1136/dtb.2024.000036