Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2024 Feb 20:1-18. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2023.2282951. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Drug discovery relies on the precise prognosis of drug-target interactions (DTI). Due to their ability to learn from raw data, deep learning (DL) methods have displayed outstanding performance over traditional approaches. However, challenges such as imbalanced data, noise, poor generalization, high cost, and time-consuming processes hinder progress in this field. To overcome the above challenges, we propose a DL-based model termed DrugSchizoNet for drug interaction (DI) prediction of Schizophrenia. Our model leverages drug-related data from the DrugBank and repoDB databases, employing three key preprocessing techniques. First, data cleaning eliminates duplicate or incomplete entries to ensure data integrity. Next, normalization is performed to enhance security and reduce costs associated with data acquisition. Finally, feature extraction is applied to improve the quality of input data. The three layers of the DrugSchizoNet model are the input, hidden and output layers. In the hidden layer, we employ dropout regularization to mitigate overfitting and improve generalization. The fully connected (FC) layer extracts relevant features, while the LSTM layer captures the sequential nature of DIs. In the output layer, our model provides confidence scores for potential DIs. To optimize the prediction accuracy, we utilize hyperparameter tuning through OB-MOA optimization. Experimental results demonstrate that DrugSchizoNet achieves a superior accuracy of 98.70%. The existing models, including CNN-RNN, DANN, CKA-MKL, DGAN, and CNN, across various evaluation metrics such as accuracy, recall, specificity, precision, F1 score, AUPR, and AUROC are compared with the proposed model. By effectively addressing the challenges of imbalanced data, noise, poor generalization, high cost and time-consuming processes, DrugSchizoNet offers a promising approach for accurate DTI prediction in Schizophrenia. Its superior performance demonstrates the potential of DL in advancing drug discovery and development processes.

PMID:38375638 | DOI:10.1080/10255842.2023.2282951

Inn Med (Heidelb). 2024 Feb 19. doi: 10.1007/s00108-024-01669-4. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare yet potentially life-threatening disease. Besides intrinsic DILI, which is mainly caused by paracetamol overdosing and which is dose-dependent and predictable, there is idiosyncratic DILI-an unpredictable and dose-independent injury of the liver caused by certain medications that only occurs in a minority of patients taking this drug. The reason why some patients react with DILI towards a specific drug is still unknown. However, the immune system plays a central role, which is underlined by the association of certain human leukocyte antigen (HLA) polymorphisms and DILI caused by specific drug classes. Due to the immunological processes that lead to the liver injury in DILI, there are great overlaps regarding laboratory and histological parameters between DILI and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Differentiating DILI and AIH can therefore be challenging, especially at the time of presentation. In addition, there are other immunologically mediated DILI phenotypes, in particular the newly defined drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-ALH) and liver injuries caused by checkpoint inhibitors (CPI). DI-ALH is characterized by autoimmune features and good responses towards corticosteroids, with the difference that DI-ALH mostly does not relapse after discontinuation of corticosteroids. CPI-induced liver injury has become more frequent with the rising use of those drugs and is characterized by a distinct histopathological pattern with granulomatous hepatitis and infiltration dominated by cytotoxic T cells. Similarly, the recently recognized liver injury following vaccinations also shows an autoimmune phenotype; however, in contrast to AIH, cytotoxic T cells seem to dominate the inflammatory infiltrates in the liver.

PMID:38374310 | DOI:10.1007/s00108-024-01669-4

J Leukoc Biol. 2024 Feb 19:qiae031. doi: 10.1093/jleuko/qiae031. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

The cell surface molecule CD40 is a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily and is broadly expressed by immune cells including B cells, dendritic cells (DC), and monocytes, as well as other normal cells and some malignant cellsCD40 is constitutively expressed on antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and ligation promotes functional maturation leading to an increase in antigen presentation, cytokine production, and a subsequent increase in the activation of antigen specific T cells. It is postulated that CD40 agonists can mediate both T-cell-dependent and T-cell-independent immune mechanisms of tumor regression in mice and patients. In addition, it is believed that CD40 activation also promotes apoptotic death of tumor cells and that the presence of the molecule on the surface of cancer cells is an important factor in the generation of tumor-specific T-cell responses that contribute to tumor cell elimination. Notably, CD40-agonistic therapies were evaluated in patients with solid tumors and hematologic malignancies with reported success as a single agent. Preclinical studies have shown that subcutaneous administration of CD40-agonistic antibodies reduces systemic toxicity and elicits a stronger and localized pharmacodynamic response. Two independent studies in cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fascicularis) studies were performed to further evaluate, potentially immunotoxicological effects associated with drug-induced adverse events seen in human subjects. Studies conducted in monkeys showed that when selicrelumab is administered at doses currently used in clinical trial patients, via subcutaneous injection, it is safe and effective at stimulating a systemic immune response.

PMID:38372596 | DOI:10.1093/jleuko/qiae031

Cureus. 2024 Jan 19;16(1):e52587. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52587. eCollection 2024 Jan.

ABSTRACT

Mesalamine is a first-line drug used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), specifically ulcerative colitis (UC), with side effects ranging from gastrointestinal effects to cardiotoxicity. We present a rare case of mesalamine-induced myopericarditis in a patient with IBD, who presented with epigastric pain and was found to have elevated an c-reactive protein (CRP) in the absence of chest pain and any other gastrointestinal symptoms. This case highlights the importance of including myopericarditis as a differential for IBD patients on mesalamine with an isolated elevated CRP, especially within the first month of initiating this medication, as drug cessation usually leads to immediate clinical improvement.

PMID:38370999 | PMC:PMC10874644 | DOI:10.7759/cureus.52587

BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 17;14(2):e074956. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074956.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The development of oral anticancer agents (OAA) has profoundly changed cancer care, leading patients to manage their chemotherapy treatment on an outpatient basis. The prevention of iatrogenic effects of OAA remains a major concern, especially since their side effects are not less serious than those of intravenous chemotherapy. The ONCORAL programme was set up to secure the management of OAA in cancer patients followed at the Lyon University Hospital. This multidisciplinary programme involves hospital pharmacists, nurses, oncologists, and haematologists, as well as community health professionals. Given the economic stakes that this programme entails for the health system, a medico-economic study was designed.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective controlled study, with individual open-label randomisation. A total of 216 outpatients treated with OAA and at risk of developing a drug-related iatrogenic event, will be randomised (2:1) to undergo follow-up in the ONCORAL programme or usual care. The primary outcome will be the estimation of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (difference in total costs per quality adjusted life years gained) at 12 months between the two groups. The secondary outcomes will be evaluation of OAA management consequences (relative-dose intensity, adherence, adverse drug events, drug-drug interactions, and proven medication errors), evaluation of overall survival and cancer-related quality of life, and patient-reported outcomes in relation to the treatment. A budget impact analysis will be implemented. Patient and health professional satisfaction regarding the ONCORAL programme will be measured.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval to conduct this study was obtained from an Ethics Committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile-de-France VI) in October 2019, and from the French data protection agency (Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés), according to the French Law. Trial results will be disseminated at clinical conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03660670.

PMID:38367968 | DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074956

Oncologist. 2024 Feb 16:oyae005. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae005. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the activity of apatinib plus toripalimab in the second line for patients with advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer (GC/EGJC).

METHODS: In this open-label, phase II, randomized trial, patients with advanced GC/EGJC who progressed after first-line chemotherapy were enrolled and received 250 mg apatinib per day plus 240 mg toripalimab on day 1 per 3 weeks (arm A) or physician's choice of chemotherapy (PC, arm B). The primary endpoint of this study was the 1-year survival rate. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and safety were assessed as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS: Twenty-five patients received apatinib plus toripalimab while 26 were enrolled in arm B. The 1-year survival rates of the 2 groups were 43.3% and 42.3%, respectively (P = .903). The PFS was 2.77 versus 2.33 months (P = .660). The OS was 8.30 versus 9.88 months (P = .539). An objective response was reported in 20.0% of patients in arm A compared to 26.9% in arm B (P = .368), respectively. A total of 6 (24.0%) patients experienced adverse events of grade ≥ 3 in arm A, while 9 (34.6%) patients suffered from adverse events of grade ≥ 3 in arm B. No drug-related deaths occurred in either group.

CONCLUSION: Toripalimab plus apatinib treatment in second-line therapy of advanced GC/EGJC showed manageable toxicity but did not improve clinical outcomes relative to PC treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04190745).

PMID:38366886 | DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyae005

BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 15;14(2):e079798. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079798.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prognostic impact of initial lung cancer (LC) on second primary breast cancer after LC (LC-BC) and further develop a nomogram for predicting the survival of patients.

METHODS: All patients diagnosed with LC-BC and first primary BC (BC-1) during 2000-2017 were collected from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Pathological features, treatment strategies and survival outcomes were compared between LC-BC and BC-1 before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the prognostic factors associated with LC in patients with LC-BC. Additionally, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis was used to select clinical characteristics for nomogram construction, which were subsequently evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS: 827 429 patients with BC-1 and 1445 patients with LC-BC were included in the analysis. Before and after PSM, patients with BC-1 had a better prognosis than individuals with LC-BC in terms of both overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Furthermore, characteristics such as more regional lymph node dissection, earlier stage and the lack of chemotherapy and radiation for LC were found to have a stronger predictive influence on LC-BC. The C-index values (OS, 0.748; BCSS, 0.818), calibration curves and DCA consistently demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy of the nomogram.

CONCLUSION: In conclusion, patients with LC-BC have a poorer prognosis than those with BC-1, and LC traits can assist clinicians estimate survival of patients with LC-BC more accurately.

PMID:38365292 | DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079798

Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Feb 13:S2468-1253(23)00454-5. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00454-5. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of the COSMIC-312 trial was to evaluate cabozantinib plus atezolizumab versus sorafenib in patients with previously untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. In the initial analysis, cabozantinib plus atezolizumab significantly prolonged progression-free survival versus sorafenib. Here, we report the pre-planned final overall survival analysis and updated safety and efficacy results following longer follow-up.

METHODS: COSMIC-312 was an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study done across 178 centres in 32 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma were eligible. Patients must have had measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), and adequate marrow and organ function, including Child-Pugh class A liver function; those with fibrolamellar carcinoma, sarcomatoid hepatocellular carcinoma, or combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma were ineligible. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1:1) using a web-based interactive response system to a combination of oral cabozantinib 40 mg once daily plus intravenous atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks, oral sorafenib 400 mg twice daily, or oral single-agent cabozantinib 60 mg once daily. Randomisation was stratified by disease aetiology, geographical region, and presence of extrahepatic disease or macrovascular invasion. Dual primary endpoints were for cabozantinib plus atezolizumab versus sorafenib: progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1, as assessed by a blinded independent radiology committee, in the first 372 randomly assigned patients (previously reported) and overall survival in all patients randomly assigned to cabozantinib plus atezolizumab or sorafenib. The secondary endpoint was progression-free survival in all patients randomly assigned to cabozantinib versus sorafenib. Outcomes in all randomly assigned patients, including final overall survival, are presented. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03755791.

FINDINGS: Between Dec 7, 2018, and Aug 27, 2020, 432 patients were randomly assigned to combination treatment, 217 to sorafenib, and 188 to single-agent cabozantinib, and included in all efficacy analyses. 704 (84%) patients were male and 133 (16%) were female. 824 of these patients received at least one dose of study treatment and were included in the safety population. Median follow-up was 22·1 months (IQR 19·3-24·8). Median overall survival was 16·5 months (96% CI 14·5-18·7) for the combination treatment group and 15·5 months (12·2-20·0) for the sorafenib group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·98 [0·78-1·24]; stratified log-rank p=0·87). Median progression-free survival was 6·9 months (99% CI 5·7-8·2) for the combination treatment group, 4·3 months (2·9-6·1) for the sorafenib group, and 5·8 months (99% CI 5·4-8·2) for the single-agent cabozantinib group (HR 0·74 [0·56-0·97] for combination treatment vs sorafenib; HR 0·78 [99% CI 0·56-1·09], p=0·05, for single-agent cabozantinib vs sorafenib). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 281 (66%) of 429 patients in the combination treatment group, 100 (48%) of 207 patients in the sorafenib group, and 108 (57%) of 188 patients in the single-agent cabozantinib group; the most common were hypertension (37 [9%] vs 17 [8%] vs 23 [12%]), palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (36 [8%] vs 18 [9%] vs 16 [9%]), aspartate aminotransferase increased (42 [10%] vs eight [4%] vs 17 [9%]), and alanine aminotransferase increased (40 [9%] vs six [3%] vs 13 [7%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 223 (52%) patients in the combination treatment group, 84 (41%) patients in the sorafenib group, and 87 (46%) patients in the single agent cabozantinib group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in six (1%) patients in the combination treatment group (encephalopathy, hepatic failure, drug-induced liver injury, oesophageal varices haemorrhage, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and tumour lysis syndrome), one (<1%) in the sorafenib group (general physical health deterioration), and four (2%) in the single-agent cabozantinib group (asthenia, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, sepsis, and gastric perforation).

INTERPRETATION: First-line cabozantinib plus atezolizumab did not improve overall survival versus sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The progression-free survival benefit of the combination versus sorafenib was maintained, with no new safety signals.

FUNDING: Exelixis and Ipsen.

PMID:38364832 | DOI:10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00454-5

JAMA. 2024 Feb 16. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.0728. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Angiotensinogen is the most upstream precursor of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, a key pathway in blood pressure (BP) regulation. Zilebesiran, an investigational RNA interference therapeutic, targets hepatic angiotensinogen synthesis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate antihypertensive efficacy and safety of different zilebesiran dosing regimens.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This phase 2, randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study of zilebesiran vs placebo was performed at 78 sites across 4 countries. Screening initiation occurred in July 2021 and the last patient visit of the 6-month study occurred in June 2023. Adults with mild to moderate hypertension, defined as daytime mean ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) of 135 to 160 mm Hg following antihypertensive washout, were randomized.

INTERVENTIONS: Randomization to 1 of 4 subcutaneous zilebesiran regimens (150, 300, or 600 mg once every 6 months or 300 mg once every 3 months) or placebo (once every 3 months) for 6 months.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was between-group difference in least-squares mean (LSM) change from baseline to month 3 in 24-hour mean ambulatory SBP.

RESULTS: Of 394 randomized patients, 377 (302 receiving zilebesiran and 75 receiving placebo) comprised the full analysis set (93 Black patients [24.7%]; 167 [44.3%] women; mean [SD] age, 57 [11] years). At 3 months, 24-hour mean ambulatory SBP changes from baseline were -7.3 mm Hg (95% CI, -10.3 to -4.4) with zilebesiran, 150 mg, once every 6 months; -10.0 mm Hg (95% CI, -12.0 to -7.9) with zilebesiran, 300 mg, once every 3 months or every 6 months; -8.9 mm Hg (95% CI, -11.9 to -6.0) with zilebesiran, 600 mg, once every 6 months; and 6.8 mm Hg (95% CI, 3.6-9.9) with placebo. LSM differences vs placebo in change from baseline to month 3 were -14.1 mm Hg (95% CI, -19.2 to -9.0; P < .001) with zilebesiran, 150 mg, once every 6 months; -16.7 mm Hg (95% CI, -21.2 to -12.3; P < .001) with zilebesiran, 300 mg, once every 3 months or every 6 months; and -15.7 mm Hg (95% CI, -20.8 to -10.6; P < .001) with zilebesiran, 600 mg, once every 6 months. Over 6 months, 60.9% of patients receiving zilebesiran had adverse events vs 50.7% patients receiving placebo and 3.6% had serious adverse events vs 6.7% receiving placebo. Nonserious drug-related adverse events occurred in 16.9% of zilebesiran-treated patients (principally injection site reactions and mild hyperkalemia) and 8.0% of placebo-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In adults with mild to moderate hypertension, treatment with zilebesiran across a range of doses at 3-month or 6-month intervals significantly reduced 24-hour mean ambulatory SBP at month 3.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04936035.

PMID:38363577 | DOI:10.1001/jama.2024.0728

Front Neurol. 2024 Feb 1;14:1331241. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1331241. eCollection 2023.

ABSTRACT

Drug-induced tremor is a common side effect of lithium with an occurrence of approximately 25% of patients. Cessation of the offending drug can be difficult, and many medical treatments for drug-induced tremor are ineffective. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been shown in a limited number of case reports to effectively reduce drug-induced tremor, however, which remains an invasive therapeutic option. MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy is an FDA-approved non-invasive treatment for essential tremor (ET). To the best of our knowledge, MRgFUS thalamotomy has never been reported to treat drug-induced tremor. Here, we present a case of a left-handed 55-year-old man with a progressive, medically refractory lithium-induced tremor of the bilateral upper extremities. The patient underwent MRgFUS thalamotomy targeting the right ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus to treat the left hand. There was almost complete resolution of his left-hand tremor immediately following MRgFUS. There were no side effects. The patient continues to show excellent tremor control at 90-day follow-up and remains free from side effects. This case demonstrates MRgFUS thalamotomy as a possible novel treatment option to treat drug-induced tremor.

PMID:38362012 | PMC:PMC10867204 | DOI:10.3389/fneur.2023.1331241

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024 Feb;33(2):e5735. doi: 10.1002/pds.5735.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Medication error (ME) surveillance in Danish healthcare relies on the mandatory national incident reporting system, the Danish Patient Safety Database (DPSD). Individual case reviews and descriptive statistics with frequency counts are the most often used approaches when analyzing MEs in incident reporting systems, including the DPSD. However, incident reporting systems often generate a large number of reports and may suffer from underreporting; consequently, additional approaches are needed to overcome these challenges. Disproportionality analysis (DPA) is a statistical tool used for signal detection of adverse drug reactions in pharmacovigilance reports, but the evidence for using DPA on ME analysis in safety reporting systems is limited.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to test the feasibility of DPA by analysing harmful MEs reported to DPSD 2014-2018.

METHODS: We utilized proportional reporting ratios (PRR) to identify signals of diproportionality.

RESULTS: We identified well-known high-risk medicines, including anticoagulants, opioids, insulins, antiepileptic, and antipsychotic drugs, and their association with several ME types and stages in a medication process.

CONCLUSION: DPA might be suggested as an additional tool for screening MEs and identifying priority areas for further investigation in safety reporting systems.

PMID:38357842 | DOI:10.1002/pds.5735

Nurs Health Sci. 2024 Mar;26(1):e13084. doi: 10.1111/nhs.13084.

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic deeply affected the lives of children and young people; studies report adverse effects on mental, physical, and social well-being. However, the impact of the pandemic on obesity care for children received little attention. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the challenges youth healthcare nurses experienced and to describe implications for future obesity care and policy. We conducted interviews, participant observations, and a group session with youth healthcare nurses during the pandemic in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Youth healthcare nurses reported a deterioration in the problems of children and young people who were already in the highest classification for pediatric obesity, such as increased weight gain, mental health problems, and socio-economic problems. The nurses experienced immense challenges while trying to provide obesity care, such as a decrease in face-to-face contact with youth and their families, as well as loss of continuity of care. It is important to reconnect with these families, invest in a trusted relationship with youth receiving obesity care, and prioritize available and accessible obesity care for those who need it the most.

PMID:38356109 | DOI:10.1111/nhs.13084

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Feb 15:rapm-2023-104851. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104851. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Hallucinogen exposure in patients in the perioperative period presents challenges for anesthesiologists and other anesthesia providers. Acute and chronic exposure to these substances can cause physiological impacts that can affect the function of anesthetic and analgesic medications used during perioperative care. The objective of this narrative review is to educate readers on the wide array of hallucinogens and psychedelics that may influence the perioperative management of patients exposed to these substances. A narrative review of the literature surrounding hallucinogens and psychedelics was completed. Hallucinogens and psychedelics are quite varied in their mechanisms of action and therefore present a variety of perioperative implications and perioperative considerations. Many of these substances increase serotonin levels or act directly at serotonergic receptors. However, there are other relevant actions that may include varied mechanisms from N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonism to stimulation of muscarinic receptors. With hallucinogen exposure rates on the rise, understanding the effects of hallucinogens is important for optimizing management and reducing risks perioperatively for patients with acute or chronic exposure.

PMID:38359966 | DOI:10.1136/rapm-2023-104851

Int Immunopharmacol. 2024 Feb 14;129:111606. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.111606. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used for a variety of cancers and are associated with a risk of developing immune-related adverse events, most commonly dermatitis, colitis, hepatitis, and pneumonitis. Immune-mediated hematologic toxicities have been reported, but are less well-described in the literature. Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a rare autoimmune, hematologic adverse event that has been reported with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational analysis of the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data. We searched for cases of ITP reported with exposure to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors from initial FDA approval for each agent to September 30, 2022. Disproportionality signal analysis was done by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR). Oxaliplatin was used as a positive control for sensitivity analysis as it is an anticancer therapy that has been associated with drug-induced ITP. A systematic review of the PubMed database was also conducted to identify published cases of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-induced ITP.

RESULTS: There were 329 reports of ITP with ICIs in the FAERS database that were reviewed for a disproportionality signal, including atezolizumab (n = 27), durvalumab (n = 17), nivolumab (n = 160), and pembrolizumab (n = 125). The ROR was significant for atezolizumab (ROR 5.39, 95 % CI 3.69-7.87), avelumab (ROR 10.32, 95 % CI 4.91-21.69), durvalumab (ROR 7.91, 95 % CI 4.91-12.75), nivolumab (ROR 9.76, 95 % CI 8.34-11.43), and pembrolizumab (ROR 12.6, 95 % CI 10.55-15.06). In our systematic review, we summated 57 cases of ICI-induced ITP. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab had the most reported cases of ITP in the literature. Most cases reported (53 %) included ITP-directed therapies beyond corticosteroids for the management of ICI-induced ITP.

CONCLUSION: There is a significant reporting signal of ITP with several ICI agents. Clinicians should be aware of and monitor for signs of this potentially serious adverse event.

PMID:38359661 | DOI:10.1016/j.intimp.2024.111606

Adv Ther. 2024 Feb 15. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02795-z. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This article aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) in adults with focal-onset seizures on specific concomitant antiseizure medications (ASMs) taken as part of their treatment regimen.

METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of pooled data from double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (N01252/NCT00490035, N01253/NCT00464269, and N01358/NCT01261325) in patients with uncontrolled focal-onset seizures randomized to BRV (50-200 mg/day) or placebo on the most common concomitant ASMs at trial initiation.

RESULTS: Nine concomitant ASMs were analyzed: carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), valproate (VPA), oxcarbazepine (OXC), topiramate (TPM), phenytoin (PHT), lacosamide (LCM), clobazam (CLB), and phenobarbital (PHB). Reduction over placebo in focal-onset seizure frequency per 28 days with BRV ranged from 11.7% (concomitant OXC) to 33.5% (concomitant PHB). The median percentage reduction from baseline in focal-onset seizure frequency per 28 days ranged from 25.5% to 42.8% in patients on BRV (placebo 4.4-21.2%); 50% responder rates ranged from 31.9% to 44.9% in patients on BRV (placebo 11.4-25.2%). In patients on BRV, seizure freedom ranged from 1.4% (concomitant PHT) to 12.5% (concomitant LCM); seizure freedom ranged from 0% to 1.2% in patients on placebo. All efficacy endpoints analyzed were consistently numerically higher in patients on BRV versus placebo. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was generally similar across subgroups by specific concomitant ASMs in patients on BRV (range 60.8-74.5%) or placebo (range 53.8-66.7%). Drug-related TEAEs were numerically higher across all subgroups by concomitant ASM in patients on BRV (range 35.2-48.3%) versus placebo (range 23.9-37.1%). Discontinuations due to TEAEs ranged from 2.9% to 13.3% in patients on BRV and was 0-5.7% for patients taking placebo across subgroups.

CONCLUSION: BRV was efficacious and well tolerated regardless of the specific concomitant ASMs used as part of their treatment regimen. These data show that in patients with focal-onset seizures, BRV provides additional efficacy to a broad range of ASMs.

PMID:38356105 | DOI:10.1007/s12325-024-02795-z

J Med Chem. 2024 Feb 22;67(4):2264-2286. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c01892. Epub 2024 Feb 13.

ABSTRACT

Delamanid, bedaquiline, and pretomanid have been recently added in the anti-tuberculosis (anti-TB) treatment regimens and have emerged as potential solutions for combating drug-resistant TB. These drugs have proven to be effective in treating drug-resistant TB when used in combination. However, concerns have been raised about the eventual loss of these drugs due to evolving resistance mechanisms and certain adverse effects such as prolonged QT period, gastrointestinal problems, hepatotoxicity, and renal disorders. This Perspective emphasizes the properties of these first-in-class drugs, including their mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics profiles, clinical studies, adverse events, and underlying resistance mechanisms. A brief coverage of efforts toward the generation of best-in-class leads in each class is also provided. The ongoing clinical trials of new combinations of these drugs are discussed, thus providing a better insight into the use of these drugs while designing an effective treatment regimen for resistant TB cases.

PMID:38351709 | DOI:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c01892

J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2024 Mar;131(3):253-266. doi: 10.1007/s00702-024-02738-6. Epub 2024 Feb 14.

ABSTRACT

Edema as an adverse drug reaction is a commonly underestimated yet potentially debilitating condition. This study analyzes the incidence of severe psychotropic drug-induced edema (e.g., edema affecting the face, legs, or multiple body parts and lasting for more than 1 week, or in any case necessitating subsequent diuretic use) among psychiatric inpatients. The cases under examination are derived from an observational pharmacovigilance program conducted in German-speaking countries ("Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie", AMSP) from 1993 to 2016. Among the 462,661 inpatients monitored, severe edema was reported in 231 cases, resulting in an incidence of 0.05%. Edema occurred more frequently in women (80% of all cases) and older patients (mean age 51.8 years). Pregabalin had the highest incidence of severe edema, affecting 1.46‰ of patients treated with pregabalin, followed by mirtazapine (0.8‰). The majority of edema cases showed a positive response to appropriate countermeasures, such as dose reduction and drug discontinuation, and resolved by the end of the observation period. While most instances of drug-induced edema are reversible, they can have a significant impact on patient well-being and potentially result in decreased treatment adherence. It is, therefore, crucial to remain vigilant regarding risk-increasing circumstances during treatment with psychotropic drugs.

PMID:38353811 | PMC:PMC10874320 | DOI:10.1007/s00702-024-02738-6

Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 14;14(1):3759. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53684-y.

ABSTRACT

Adjuvant Temozolomide is considered the front-line Glioblastoma chemotherapeutic treatment; yet not all patients respond. Latest trends in clinical trials usually refer to Doxorubicin; yet it can lead to severe side-effects if administered in high doses. While Glioblastoma prognosis remains poor, little is known about the combination of the two chemotherapeutics. Patient-derived spheroids were generated and treated with a range of Temozolomide/Doxorubicin concentrations either as monotherapy or in combination. Optical microscopy was used to monitor the growth pattern and cell death. Based on the monotherapy experiments, we developed a probabilistic mathematical framework in order to describe the drug-induced effect at the single-cell level and simulate drug doses in combination assuming probabilistic independence. Doxorubicin was found to be effective in doses even four orders of magnitude less than Temozolomide in monotherapy. The combination therapy doses tested in vitro were able to lead to irreversible growth inhibition at doses where monotherapy resulted in relapse. In our simulations, we assumed both drugs are anti-mitotic; Temozolomide has a growth-arrest effect, while Doxorubicin is able to cumulatively cause necrosis. Interestingly, under no mechanistic synergy assumption, the in silico predictions underestimate the in vitro results. In silico models allow the exploration of a variety of potential underlying hypotheses. The simulated-biological discrepancy at certain doses indicates a supra-additive response when both drugs are combined. Our results suggest a Temozolomide-Doxorubicin dual chemotherapeutic scheme to both disable proliferation and increase cytotoxicity against Glioblastoma.

PMID:38355655 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-53684-y

Rev Prat. 2023 Oct;73(8):885-889.

ABSTRACT

NOCEBO PLACEBO, THE HIDDEN SIDE OF OUR TREATMENTS. Our knowledge of the placebo effect and its opposite, the nocebo effect, has changed dramatically in the last 20 years. Any treatment activity induces this type of effect. The placebo groups in clinical studies have biases that profoundly alter their neutrality. The nocebo effect is omnipresent in daily practice, it contributes to induce many of the adverse drug effects. The use of «impure» placebos is also widespread in daily practice. The placebo effect has an objectivable and reproducible neurobiological substrate. Its therapeutic effects are well documented. Disorders, symptoms involving the central nervous system (CNS) respond more easily to placebo. These new data make it possible to improve clinical practices by developing the quality of relationships with patients and families as well as the methodology of clinical trials.

PMID:38354014

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Feb 14. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16486. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Healing rates of severe erosive esophagitis (EE; Los Angeles [LA] Grade C/D) in patients treated with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is suboptimal (~60-70%). Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is suggested to have better healing rates in patients with severe EE. This meta-analysis compares the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan 20 mg versus lansoprazole 30 mg daily in healing EE, specifically in those with LA Grade C/D.

METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL on May 24, 2023. Studies that randomized EE patients to vonoprazan 20 mg daily or lansoprazole 30 mg daily and compared healing rates were included. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 tool. The fixed-effect model was used to obtain the pooled efficacy and safety outcomes. Subgroup analysis was done to compare healing rates in mild (LA Grade A/B) versus severe EE and based on study location.

RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with low risks of bias comprising 2208 participants were included. Vonoprazan 20 mg was superior to lansoprazole 30 mg daily in healing severe EE at all weeks (Week 2 RR 1.294 [95% CI 1.169-1.433], Week 4 1.160 [1.059-1.270], and Week 8 1.175 [95% CI 1.107-1.247]), but was similar for mild EE at all weeks (P-interaction < 0.01). Vonoprazan 20 mg was more efficacious than lansoprazole 30 mg at Week 8 in Western versus Asian studies (P-interaction < 0.01). Any, serious, and drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSION: Vonoprazan 20 mg is superior to lansoprazole 30 mg for healing severe EE but not mild EE. Vonoprazan 20 mg daily has a similar safety profile to lansoprazole 30 mg daily.

PMID:38353152 | DOI:10.1111/jgh.16486