Drug-induced Adverse Events

Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Drug-Related Side Effects: A Scoping Review

Thu, 2024-06-27 06:00

Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Jun 17;17(6):795. doi: 10.3390/ph17060795.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Drug safety relies on advanced methods for timely and accurate prediction of side effects. To tackle this requirement, this scoping review examines machine-learning approaches for predicting drug-related side effects with a particular focus on chemical, biological, and phenotypical features.

METHODS: This was a scoping review in which a comprehensive search was conducted in various databases from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2023.

RESULTS: The results showed the widespread use of Random Forest, k-nearest neighbor, and support vector machine algorithms. Ensemble methods, particularly random forest, emphasized the significance of integrating chemical and biological features in predicting drug-related side effects.

CONCLUSIONS: This review article emphasized the significance of considering a variety of features, datasets, and machine learning algorithms for predicting drug-related side effects. Ensemble methods and Random Forest showed the best performance and combining chemical and biological features improved prediction. The results suggested that machine learning techniques have some potential to improve drug development and trials. Future work should focus on specific feature types, selection techniques, and graph-based methods for even better prediction.

PMID:38931462 | DOI:10.3390/ph17060795

Categories: Literature Watch

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers vs. Proton Pump Inhibitors for Peptic Ulcer with or without <em>Helicobacter pylori</em> Infection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Thu, 2024-06-27 06:00

Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 May 28;17(6):698. doi: 10.3390/ph17060698.

ABSTRACT

Novel potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) have emerged as effective acid-suppressive drugs in recent years, replacing proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). We aim to compare the efficacy and safety of P-CABs versus PPIs in the treatment of peptic ulcers with or without Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. We searched in PubMed, Embase, WOS, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI, and Wanfang databases (all years up to January 2024). Efficacy and safety outcomes were evaluated using odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA) probabilities were used to rank each intervention. Among 14,056 studies screened, 56 studies involving 9792 participants were analyzed. Vonoprazan demonstrated the best efficacy in ulcer healing rate and H. pylori eradication rate (SUCRA = 86.4% and 90.7%, respectively). Keverprazan ranked second in ulcer healing rates (SUCRA = 76.0%) and was more effective in pain remission rates (SUCRA = 91.7%). The risk of adverse events was low for keverprazan (SUCRA = 11.8%) and tegoprazan (SUCRA = 12.9%), and moderate risk for vonoprazan (SUCRA = 44.3%) was demonstrated. Compared to lansoprazole, vonoprazan exhibited a higher risk of drug-related adverse events (OR: 2.15; 95% CI: 1.60-2.89) and serious adverse events (OR: 2.22; 95% CI: 1.11-4.42). Subgroup analysis on patients with H. pylori-positive peptic ulcers showed that vonoprazan was at the top of the SUCRA rankings, followed by keverprazan. Vonoprazan showed superior performance in peptic ulcers, especially for patients with H. pylori-positive peptic ulcers. However, the risk of adverse events associated with vonoprazan should be noted. Keverprazan has also shown good therapeutic outcomes and has performed better in terms of safety.

PMID:38931366 | DOI:10.3390/ph17060698

Categories: Literature Watch

How could employing the patient perspective transform pharmacovigilance?

Wed, 2024-06-26 06:00

Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2024 Jul;23(7):793-796. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2373905. Epub 2024 Jul 3.

NO ABSTRACT

PMID:38922349 | DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2373905

Categories: Literature Watch

Surveillance of adverse events following immunisation in Australia, COVID-19 vaccines, 2021

Wed, 2024-06-26 06:00

Commun Dis Intell (2018). 2024 Jun 24;48. doi: 10.33321/cdi.2024.48.2.

ABSTRACT

This report summarises Australia's spontaneous (passive) surveillance data for adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in 2021 reported to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). The TGA strongly promoted and facilitated adverse event reporting in preparation for, and during, the COVID-19 vaccine rollout as a core component of the most intensive vaccine safety monitoring ever conducted in Australia. There were 111,348 AEFI reports for COVID-19 vaccines administered in 2021, an annual AEFI reporting rate of 271.4 per 100,000 doses of COVID-19 vaccines administered to people aged ≥ 12 years. The annual AEFI reporting rate for non-COVID-19 vaccines in 2021 was 30.6 per 100,000 doses administered to people of all ages. Overall, the most frequently reported symptoms were headache, adverse events classified as 'gastrointestinal nonspecific symptoms and therapeutic procedures', myalgia, pyrexia and fatigue, which were consistent with common expected adverse events following COVID-19 vaccines used in Australia. The most commonly reported adverse events of special interest were myocarditis and/or pericarditis, followed by thrombosis and thromboembolism, and anaphylaxis. Of all COVID-19 vaccine AEFI reports, 762 (0.7%) included a fatal outcome, of which over 80% were in people aged ≥ 60 years. Thirteen deaths reported in 2021 were assessed as likely to be causally linked to vaccination. This report confirms the value of spontaneous post-marketing vaccine pharmacovigilance, especially in the context of new vaccines using novel vaccine technologies and near whole-of-population pandemic vaccination programs. The most frequently reported AEFI for COVID-19 vaccines were common, mild and temporary (lasting 1 or 2 days), and consistent with clinical trial and active surveillance data. Ongoing safety monitoring detected rare, unexpected conditions, such as myocarditis/pericarditis and thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), which were investigated and confirmed as safety signals, resulting in changes to vaccine recommendations and product information. The outcomes of TGA monitoring were published in weekly vaccine safety reports. Overall, COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring provided critical information on the risks of vaccine related adverse events that enabled decisionmakers to undertake informed risk-benefit assessments.

PMID:38926650 | DOI:10.33321/cdi.2024.48.2

Categories: Literature Watch

Surveillance of adverse events following immunisation in Australia annual report, 2021

Wed, 2024-06-26 06:00

Commun Dis Intell (2018). 2024 Jun 24;48. doi: 10.33321/cdi.2024.48.1.

ABSTRACT

This report summarises Australia's spontaneous surveillance data for adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) for 2021 reported to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and describes reporting trends over the 22-year period 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2021. This report excludes AEFI reports featuring pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, which are reported separately. There were 3,452 AEFI reports for non-COVID-19 vaccines administered in 2021, an annual AEFI reporting rate of 13.4 per 100,000 population compared with 14.9 per 100,000 population in 2020. This small decrease in the AEFI reporting rate in 2021 could potentially be related to an increased focus on COVID-19 vaccines and related AEFI, which are not included in this report. AEFI reporting rates for individual vaccines in 2021 were similar to 2020, as were the most commonly reported adverse events. Of the six deaths following vaccination in 2021 reported to the TGA, none were found to have a causal relationship with vaccination.

PMID:38926649 | DOI:10.33321/cdi.2024.48.1

Categories: Literature Watch

Addressing Glucocorticoid-Related Problems with the Clinical Pharmacist Collaboration in Rheumatology Practice: A Prospective Follow-Up Study

Wed, 2024-06-26 06:00

Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Jun 26. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00692-z. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Glucocorticoids (GCs) play a crucial role in the treatment of many rheumatic diseases regarding their anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects. Inappropriate use of GCs can exacerbate GC-related problems besides complex treatment regimens and miscellaneous well-established adverse events. Although several guidelines exist for managing these problems, there is lack of real-life studies evaluating the problems at the patient level. This study aims to identify GC-related problems among patients with rheumatic diseases and address how they have been solved.

METHODS: This prospective follow-up study was conducted between January 2021 and June 2022 at a university rheumatology outpatient clinic and included patients using GCs. A clinical pharmacist assessed patients for possible GC-related problems at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Identified problems, their causes, interventions to address these problems, and their outcomes were categorized using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE v9.1) classification system. The resolution of the problems was evaluated at the patient's next follow-up visit.

RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were included, and 236 GC-related problems were identified in 66% of the patients. Adverse drug events (possible) accounted for the highest proportion of GC-related problems (94.1%), and the most common causes were lack of laboratory monitoring of GC-related adverse events (41.5%) and lack of drug treatment despite existing indications (39.8%). The median cumulative prednisolone dose was higher in patients with GC-related problems (3115 vs. 5455 mg, p = 0.007). The clinical pharmacist suggested 381 interventions: 47.7% (n = 182) at the 'prescriber level', 31.8% (n = 121) at the 'patient level', and 20.5% (n = 78) at the 'drug level'. Of those interventions, 98% were accepted, and 80.1% of the problems were solved.

CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the prevalence of GC-related problems is high in patients with rheumatic diseases. Integrating clinical pharmacists into the multidisciplinary rheumatology team provides an advantage in effectively identifying and managing GC-related problems at an early stage.

PMID:38926304 | DOI:10.1007/s40744-024-00692-z

Categories: Literature Watch

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of Vadadustat in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Wed, 2024-06-26 06:00

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Jun 25. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3342. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Vadadustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor for treating anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Single ascending dose (SAD) and multiple ascending dose (MAD) studies assessed pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety of vadadustat in healthy volunteers. A single-dose, open-label study was conducted in patients with CKD stages 3 and 4 not on dialysis. In the SAD study, 48 healthy adult men (n = 8/cohort) received single doses of vadadustat (80-1,200 mg) or placebo. In the MAD study, 34 healthy adult men (n = 8-9/cohort) received daily vadadustat (500-900 mg) or placebo for 10 days. In the single-dose CKD study, 22 male and female patients with CKD (stage 3: n = 10; stage 4: n = 12) received single doses of vadadustat (500 mg). PK parameters included plasma vadadustat; PD biomarkers were measured, including erythropoietin (EPO) levels, reticulocytes, and others. Plasma vadadustat peaked 3-4 hours after single or multiple dosing in healthy volunteers, with a mean t1/2 of approximately 4.5 hours. In patients with CKD, plasma vadadustat peaked at 5-6 hours, with a mean t1/2 of 7.2 (stage 3) and 8.5 (stage 4) hours. Vadadustat AUC∞ and Cmax increased dose proportionally in SAD and MAD trials. In all trials, EPO concentrations increased in a dose-related manner and returned approximately to baseline by 24 hours. Adverse events were mild and considered not study drug related. The PK and PD results of these studies were utilized for further clinical development of vadadustat for treatment of anemia in CKD patients.

PMID:38924087 | DOI:10.1002/cpt.3342

Categories: Literature Watch

Do classic psychedelics increase the risk of seizures? A scoping review

Tue, 2024-06-25 06:00

Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2024 Jun 24;85:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2024.05.002. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Seizures are a concerning adverse event frequently associated with the use of psychedelics, and hence, studies involving these substances tend to exclude patients with past history of epilepsy. This is especially relevant because epileptic seizures are markedly increased in the population suffering from mental disorders, and psychedelic assisted therapy is being researched as a promising treatment for several of them. To determine the extent of the current literature on the relationship between classic psychedelics and seizures, a scoping review was performed using the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews). The search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Google scholar, LILACS and Scielo, and both animal and human models were included. A total of 16 publications on humans, and 11 on animals, were found. The results are heterogeneous, but globally suggest that psychedelics may not increase the risk of seizures in healthy individuals or animals in the absence of other drugs. However, concomitant use of other substances or drugs, such as kambo or lithium, could increase the risk of seizures. Additionally, these conclusions are drawn from data lacking sufficient external validity, so they should be interpreted with caution. Future paths for research and a summary on possible neurobiological underpinnings that might clarify the relationship between classical psychedelics and seizures are also provided.

PMID:38917636 | DOI:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2024.05.002

Categories: Literature Watch

Possible adverse events of imidazole antifungal drugs during treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis: analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

Mon, 2024-06-24 06:00

Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 24;14(1):14560. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63315-1.

ABSTRACT

Azole antifungal drugs are commonly used to treat vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC). The nephrotoxicity and developmental toxicity of azole drugs have not been systematically analyzed in the real world. We used the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to investigate the adverse events (AEs) associated with imidazole therapy for VVC. FAERS data (from quarter 1 2004 to quarter 3 2022) were retrieved using OpenVigil 2.1, and AEs were retrieved and standardized according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). In the top 10 System Organ Class (SOC), all four drugs have been found to have kidney and urinary system diseases and pregnancy. We found significant signals, including clotrimazole [bladder transitional cell carcinoma, (report odds ratio, ROR = 291.66)], [fetal death, (ROR = 10.28)], ketoconazole[nephrogenic anemia (ROR = 22.1)], [premature rupture of membranes (ROR = 22.91 46.45, 11, 3)], Miconazole[hematuria (ROR = 19.03)], [neonatal sepsis (ROR = 123.71)], [spontaneous abortion (ROR = 5.98)], Econazole [acute kidney injury (ROR = 4.41)], [spontaneous abortion (ROR = 19.62)]. We also discovered new adverse reactions that were not reported. Therefore, when using imidazole drugs for treatment, it is necessary to closely monitor the patient's renal function, pay attention to the developmental toxicity of the fetus during pregnancy, and be aware of potential adverse reactions that may occur.

PMID:38914572 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-63315-1

Categories: Literature Watch

Efficacy and side effects of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: A meta-analysis

Mon, 2024-06-24 06:00

Oncol Lett. 2024 Jun 12;28(2):371. doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14504. eCollection 2024 Aug.

ABSTRACT

Recently, the treatment plan of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was regarded as a promising treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC). However, the efficacy and side effects of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy still lack evidence-based medical evidence to support. Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the hot issue. By searching PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, any randomized clinical studies of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced GC/GEJC met the inclusion criteria were included. The quality of the literature was evaluated and the data was extracted. A correlative software was also used to analyze the data and to draw a conclusion. After screening 14,015 studies, four studies were eligible for the meta-analysis. Compared with chemotherapy alone group, the overall survival (OS) rate was significantly longer. In programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥1 subgroup and PD-L1 CPS ≥10 subgroup analyses, the results showed that the response rate (RR) and complete response rate (CR) were both higher in pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group compared with chemotherapy alone group. There were not significant differences in the CR, the treatment-related adverse events, succumbed to drug-related events and succumbed to immune-mediated events between the two groups. However, the effect events such as the treatment-related adverse events led to discontinuation, the 3-5 treatment-related adverse events and the immune-mediated adverse events and infusion reactions were more common in pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group. In conclusion, the current meta-analysis revealed that, in treating advanced GC/GEJC, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy had improved therapeutic efficacies than chemotherapy alone, as evidenced by the significantly longer OS. Furthermore, the patients in PD-L1 CPS ≥1 subgroup and PD-L1 CPS ≥10 subgroup appeared to benefit from pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy treatment because of higher RR and CR. However, side effects such as the treatment-related adverse events leading to discontinuation, the 3-5 treatment-related adverse events, and immune-mediated adverse events and infusion reactions deserved more attention.

PMID:38910906 | PMC:PMC11190732 | DOI:10.3892/ol.2024.14504

Categories: Literature Watch

Adrenal Insufficiency and Thyrotoxicosis Following Combined Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Use: A Case Report and Literature Review

Mon, 2024-06-24 06:00

Cureus. 2024 May 22;16(5):e60850. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60850. eCollection 2024 May.

ABSTRACT

Destructive thyroiditis and secondary adrenal insufficiency are major endocrinological immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, the timing at which each event occurs most frequently after drug administration varies, and cases where multiple events occur simultaneously are rare. We encountered a patient who concurrently suffered from thyrotoxicosis and adrenal insufficiency. An 80-year-old woman with a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) was diagnosed with stage IVA squamous cell carcinoma of the lungs. Treatment with a combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab was initiated. Although she tested positive for thyroglobulin antibody and transient subclinical hyperthyroidism was observed after two courses, treatment with ICIs was continued. Four months later, treatment was discontinued due to drug-induced lung disease. One month after the last administration, the patient became unconscious and was admitted to another hospital, diagnosed with diabetic ketoacidosis, urinary tract infection, and sepsis. After acute-phase treatment, she was transferred to our hospital due to persistent fever and tachycardia. Thyrotoxicosis and adrenal insufficiency were observed, with high levels of free thyroxine, low thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and cortisol levels. Treatment with extracellular fluids, potassium iodide, beta-blockers, and hydrocortisone was initiated, and the patient's condition improved. No other pituitary hormone deficiencies were observed. She was diagnosed with painless thyroiditis and secondary adrenal insufficiency based on the positive thyroglobulin antibody, negative TSH receptor antibody, decreased Doppler flow in thyroid ultrasonography, low adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), and low response of ACTH and cortisol to corticotropin-releasing hormone loading test. MRI revealed no abnormalities. We report a case of thyrotoxicosis and secondary adrenal insufficiency five months after the first administration of nivolumab and ipilimumab. Careful follow-up and early detection of endocrine disorders are critical in patients treated with a combination of ICIs.

PMID:38910605 | PMC:PMC11191842 | DOI:10.7759/cureus.60850

Categories: Literature Watch

Treatment of Tislelizumab-Induced Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis and Agranulocytosis: A Case Report and Literature Review

Mon, 2024-06-24 06:00

Curr Drug Saf. 2024 Jun 20. doi: 10.2174/0115748863297885240604111018. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) makes up about 85% of lung cancer cases, mainly adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Recently, PD-1 inhibitors have become crucial in NSCLC treatment, significantly enhancing survival for some. However, side effects, like skin reactions and hematotoxicity, limit their use, with drug-induced TEN and immunotherapy-induced agranulocytosis as severe adverse effects.

CASE PRESENTATION: Herein, we have reported the case of a 75-year-old male diagnosed with metastatic Lung Squamous cell Carcinoma (LUSC) in the left lung. He received first-line treatment with one cycle of tislelizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin, after which he developed Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) and granulocytopenia. To address these two serious immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs), the patient was administered methylprednisolone in combination with gamma globulin for TEN and dexamethasone in combination with G-CSF for agranulocytosis. Antibiotics were also administered according to the patient's medication regimen. After treatment, the patient recovered and was discharged from the hospital. It was also noted that the lung tumor condition improved.

CONCLUSION: Effective management of severe immune-related side effects from tislelizumab, including TEN and agranulocytosis, can be partly achieved through steroids, gamma globulin, GCSF, and antibiotics. This strategy not only alleviates these adverse effects, but also potentially improves tumor conditions, highlighting the crucial role of vigilant monitoring and management in immunotherapy.

PMID:38910480 | DOI:10.2174/0115748863297885240604111018

Categories: Literature Watch

A proposal for using benefit-risk methods to improve the prominence of adverse event results when reporting trials

Sat, 2024-06-22 06:00

Trials. 2024 Jun 22;25(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08228-0.

ABSTRACT

Adverse events suffer from poor reporting within randomised controlled trials, despite them being crucial to the evaluation of a treatment. A recent update to the CONSORT harms checklist aims to improve reporting by providing structure and consistency to the information presented. We propose an extension wherein harms would be reported in conjunction with effectiveness outcome(s) rather than in silo to provide a more complete picture of the evidence acquired within a trial. Benefit-risk methods are designed to simultaneously consider both benefits and risks, and therefore, we believe these methods could be implemented to improve the prominence of adverse events when reporting trials. The aim of this article is to use case studies to demonstrate the practical utility of benefit-risk methods to present adverse events results alongside effectiveness results. Two randomised controlled trials have been selected as case studies, the Option-DM trial and the SANAD II trial. Using a previous review, a shortlist of 17 benefit-risk methods which could potentially be used for reporting RCTs was created. From this shortlist, three benefit-risk methods are applied across the two case studies. We selected these methods for their usefulness to achieve the aim of this paper and which are commonly used in the literature. The methods selected were the Benefit-Risk Action Team (BRAT) Framework, net clinical benefit (NCB), and the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) 3 × 3 table. Results using the benefit-risk method added further context and detail to the clinical summaries made from the trials. In the case of the SANAD II trial, the clinicians concluded that despite the primary outcome being improved by the treatment, the increase in adverse events negated the improvement and the treatment was therefore not recommended. The benefit-risk methods applied to this case study outlined the data that this decision was based on in a clear and transparent way. Using benefit-risk methods to report the results of trials can increase the prominence of adverse event results by presenting them alongside the primary efficacy/effectiveness outcomes. This ensures that all the factors which would be used to determine whether a treatment would be recommended are transparent to the reader.

PMID:38909232 | DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08228-0

Categories: Literature Watch

Reduction of prescription error and its adverse effects in the pediatric intensive care area

Sat, 2024-06-22 06:00

Medicina (B Aires). 2024;84(3):426-432.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Prescription is the node of medication management and use that most frequently presents medication errors, according to various studies. This study aims to analyze prescriptions before and after the incorporation of a multidisciplinary round in the pediatric intensive care area and its implication in the occurrence of adverse drug events.

METHODS: This is an uncontrolled before and after study.

RESULTS: 100 patients were studied before and 100 after, range 1-17 years, mean age: 6.4 SD: 8.7. 55.5% (n = 111) were men. A prescription error was detected before the intervention of 12% (n = 12) and after 0% of the intervention, 0%, p = 0.001. A total of 45 adverse events were detected, that is, 45 adverse events per 100 admissions and 38, that is, 38 events per 100 admissions, before and after the intervention respectively (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: The intervention was useful to reduce prescription error in this sample of patients.

PMID:38907956

Categories: Literature Watch

Efficacy and safety of albiglutide, a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Fri, 2024-06-21 06:00

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 21;103(25):e38568. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038568.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: No meta-analysis has holistically analyzed and summarized the therapeutic efficacy and safety of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes (T2D). This meta-analysis addresses this knowledge gap.

METHODS: Randomized controlled trials involving patients with T2D receiving albiglutide in the intervention arm and either a placebo or an active comparator in the control arm were searched through electronic databases. The primary outcome was the change from baseline (CFB) in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c); secondary outcomes included CFB in fasting plasma glucose, body weight, and adverse events (AE).

RESULTS: From 443 initially screened articles, data from 12 randomized controlled trials involving 6423 subjects were analyzed. Albiglutide, at both doses, outperformed placebo in terms of HbA1c reductions (for albiglutide 30 mg: mean differences -1.04%, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-1.37--0.72], P < .00001, I2 = 89%; and for albiglutide 50 mg: mean differences -1.10%, 95% CI [-1.45--0.75], P < .00001, I2 = 90%). Higher proportions of subjects achieved HbA1c < 7% in the albiglutide arm than in placebo (for albiglutide 30 mg: odds ratio 6.26, 95% CI [2.50-15.70], P < .0001, I2 = 82%; and for albiglutide 50 mg: odds ratio 5.57, 95% CI [2.25-13.80], P = .0002, I2 = 84%). Albiglutide had glycemic efficacy comparable to other glucose-lowering drugs. CFB in body weight was similar with albiglutide and placebo. AE profile, including gastrointestinal AE, was identical with albiglutide and placebo, except for higher drug-related AE and injection-site reaction with albiglutide.

CONCLUSION: Albiglutide provides reassuring data on good glycemic efficacy, tolerability, and safety over an extended period of clinical use in patients with T2D. Albiglutide 30 mg has comparable efficacy and safety profiles to albiglutide 50 mg.

PMID:38905435 | DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000038568

Categories: Literature Watch

Meta-analyzing Results From Disproportionality Analysis of Individual Case Safety Reports: A Note of Caution

Thu, 2024-06-20 06:00

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024 Jul-Aug 01;44(4):443-444. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001881. Epub 2024 Jun 21.

NO ABSTRACT

PMID:38901011 | DOI:10.1097/JCP.0000000000001881

Categories: Literature Watch

Effects of Oral ALZ-801/Valiltramiprosate on Plasma Biomarkers, Brain Hippocampal Volume, and Cognition: Results of 2-Year Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase 2 Trial in APOE4 Carriers with Early Alzheimer's Disease

Thu, 2024-06-20 06:00

Drugs. 2024 Jun 20. doi: 10.1007/s40265-024-02067-8. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: ALZ-801/valiltramiprosate is a small-molecule oral inhibitor of beta amyloid (Aβ) aggregation and oligomer formation being studied in a phase 2 trial in APOE4 carriers with early Alzheimer's disease (AD) to evaluate treatment effects on fluid and imaging biomarkers and cognitive assessments.

METHODS: The single-arm, open-label phase 2 trial was designed to evaluate the effects of the ALZ-801 265 mg tablet taken twice daily (after 2 weeks once daily) on plasma fluid AD biomarkers, hippocampal volume (HV), and cognition over 104 weeks in APOE4 carriers. The study enrolled subjects aged 50-80 years, with early AD [Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 22, Clinical Dementia Rating-Global (CDR-G) 0.5 or 1], apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4) genotypes including APOE4/4 and APOE3/4 genotypes, and positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) AD biomarkers or prior amyloid scans. The primary outcome was plasma p-tau181, HV evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was the key secondary outcome, and plasma Aβ42 and Aβ40 were the secondary biomarker outcomes. The cognitive outcomes were the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test. Safety and tolerability evaluations included treatment-emergent adverse events and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA). The study was designed and powered to detect 15% reduction from baseline in plasma p-tau181 at the 104-week endpoint. A sample size of 80 subjects provided adequate power to detect this difference at a significance level of 0.05 using a two-sided paired t-test.

RESULTS: The enrolled population of 84 subjects (31 homozygotes and 53 heterozygotes) was 52% females, mean age 69 years, MMSE 25.7 [70% mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 30% mild AD] with 55% on cholinesterase inhibitors. Plasma p-tau181 reduction from baseline was significant (31%, p = 0.045) at 104 weeks and all prior visits; HV atrophy was significantly reduced (p = 0.0014) compared with matched external controls from an observational Early AD study. Memory scores showed minimal decline from baseline over 104 weeks and correlated significantly with decreased HV atrophy (Spearman's 0.44, p = 0.002). Common adverse events were COVID infection and mild nausea, and no drug-related serious adverse events were reported. Of 14 early terminations, 6 were due to nonserious treatment-emergent adverse events and 1 death due to COVID. There was no vasogenic brain edema observed on MRI over 104 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS: The effect of ALZ-801 on reducing plasma p-tau181 over 2 years demonstrates target engagement and supports its anti-Aβ oligomer action that leads to a robust decrease in amyloid-induced brain neurodegeneration. The significant correlation between reduced HV atrophy and cognitive stability over 2 years suggests a disease-modifying effect of ALZ-801 treatment in patients with early AD. Together with the favorable safety profile with no events of vasogenic brain edema, these results support further evaluation of ALZ-801 in a broader population of APOE4 carriers, who represent two-thirds of patients with AD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04693520 .

PMID:38902571 | DOI:10.1007/s40265-024-02067-8

Categories: Literature Watch

Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) through elastomeric continuous infusion pumps in a real-life observational study: Characteristics, safety, and efficacy analysis

Thu, 2024-06-20 06:00

Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2024 Jun 19:S2529-993X(24)00148-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eimce.2024.04.007. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to present real-life data on the use, efficacy, and safety of administering antibiotic therapy through portable elastomeric pumps (pEP) in the outpatient setting.

METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted from January 2020 to May 2023 in a large academic hospital in Rome, Italy. All patients receiving antibiotic therapy via pEP were included up to a follow-up period of 90 days after the end of antibiotic therapy. The primary outcome was the treatment response. Secondary endpoints were adverse events attributable to the drug administered, the vascular catheter, or the infection itself.

RESULTS: Of the 490 patients referred to our outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) unit, 94 (19.2%) received antibiotic therapy via pEP and were included in the final analysis. The most frequently treated infections were those involving bone and prosthetics, including spondylodiscitis (n=27; 28.8%). Most infections were due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=55; 48.3%). Cefepime (n=32; 34.0%), piperacillin/tazobactam (n=29; 30.9%), ceftolozane/tazobactam (n=7; 7.5%), and oxacillin (n=7; 7.5%) were the most frequently administered antibiotics. The infection cure rate reached 88.3% (n=83). 12 patients (12.8%) reported adverse events, of which half (6.4%) were drug-related and half (6.4%) were line-related.

CONCLUSIONS: OPAT through portable elastomeric infusion pumps proved to be safe and effective. It also contributed to the reduction of healthcare costs, fully respecting the principles of personalized medicine. This strategy has emerged as a promising tool for antibiotic stewardship and infection control.

PMID:38902156 | DOI:10.1016/j.eimce.2024.04.007

Categories: Literature Watch

A phase II, non-comparative randomised trial of two treatments involving liposomal amphotericin B and miltefosine for post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in India and Bangladesh

Thu, 2024-06-20 06:00

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Jun 20;18(6):e0012242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012242. eCollection 2024 Jun.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Southeast Asia, treatment is recommended for all patients with post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL). Adherence to the first-line regimen, twelve weeks of miltefosine (MF), is low and ocular toxicity has been observed with this exposure period. We assessed the safety and efficacy of two shorter-course treatments: liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) alone and combined with MF.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: An open-label, phase II, randomized, parallel-arm, non-comparative trial was conducted in patients with parasitologically confirmed PKDL, 6 to ≤60 years. Patients were assigned to 20 mg/kg LAmB (total dose, in five injections over 15 days) alone or combined with allometric MF (3 weeks). The primary endpoint was definitive cure at 12 months, defined as complete resolution of papular and nodular lesions and >80% re-pigmentation of macular lesions. Definitive cure at 24 months was a secondary efficacy endpoint. 118/126 patients completed the trial. Definitive cure at 12 months was observed in 29% (18/63) patients receiving LAmB and 30% (19/63) receiving LAmB/MF (mITT), increasing to 58% and 66%, respectively, at 24 months. Most lesions had resolved/improved at 12 and 24 months for patients receiving LAmB (90%, 83%) and LAmB/MF (85%, 88%) by qualitative assessment. One death, unrelated to study drugs, was reported; no study drug-related serious adverse events were observed. The most frequent adverse drug reactions were MF-related vomiting and nausea, and LAmB-related hypokalaemia and infusion reactions. Most adverse events were mild; no ocular adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Both regimens are suitably safe and efficacious alternatives to long-course MF for PKDL in South Asia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2017/04/008421.

PMID:38900786 | DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0012242

Categories: Literature Watch

Treatment patterns and survival outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit due to immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors

Thu, 2024-06-20 06:00

Cancer Med. 2024 Jun;13(12):e7302. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7302.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs) due to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can lead to admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). In this retrospective study, we determined the incidence, treatment patterns and survival outcomes of this patient population at a comprehensive cancer center.

METHODS: All patients admitted to the ICU due to irAEs from ICI treatment between January 2015 and July 2022 were included. Descriptive statistics were reported on patient characteristics and treatment patterns during hospital admission. Overall survival (OS) from the time of ICU discharge to death was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS: Over the study period, 5561 patients received at least one ICI administration, of which 32 patients (0.6%) were admitted to the ICU due to irAEs. Twenty patients were treated with anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 treatment, whereas 12 patients were treated with ICI monotherapy. The type of irAEs were de novo diabetes-related ketoacidosis (n = 8), immune-related gastrointestinal toxicity (n = 8), myocarditis or myositis (n = 10), nephritis (n = 3), pneumonitis (n = 2), and myelitis (n = 1). The median duration of ICU admission was 3 days (interquartile range: 2-6 days). Three patients died during ICU admission. The median OS of the patients who were discharged from the ICU was 18 months (95% confidence interval, 5.0-NA).

CONCLUSION: The incidence of irAEs leading to ICU admission in patients treated with ICI was low in this study. ICU mortality due to irAEs was low and a subset of this patient population even had long-term survival.

PMID:38899457 | DOI:10.1002/cam4.7302

Categories: Literature Watch

Pages