Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 19;15:1441147. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1441147. eCollection 2024.

ABSTRACT

Despite the extraordinary anti-tubercular activity of isoniazid (INH), the drug-induced hepatotoxicity and peripheral neuropathy pose a significant challenge to its wider clinical use. The primary cause of INH-induced hepatotoxicity is in vivo metabolism involving biotransformation on its terminal -NH2 group owing to its high nucleophilic nature. The human N-acetyltransferase-2 enzyme (NAT-2) exploits the reactivity of INH's terminal -NH2 functional group and inactivates it by transferring the acetyl group, which subsequently converts to toxic metabolites. This -NH2 group also tends to react with vital endogenous molecules such as pyridoxine, leading to their deficiency, a major cause of peripheral neuropathy. The elevation of liver functional markers is observed in 10%-20% of subjects on INH treatment. INH-induced risk of fatal hepatitis is about 0.05%-1%. The incidence of peripheral neuropathy is 2%-6.5%. In this review, we discuss the genesis and historical development of INH, and different reported mechanisms of action of INH. This is followed by a brief review of various clinical trials in chronological order, highlighting treatment-associated adverse events and their occurrence rates, including details such as geographical location, number of subjects, dosing concentration, and regimen used in these clinical studies. Further, we elaborated on various known metabolic transformations highlighting the involvement of the terminal -NH2 group of INH and corresponding host enzymes, the structure of different metabolites/conjugates, and their association with hepatotoxicity or neuritis. Post this deliberation, we propose a hydrolysable chemical derivatives-based approach as a way forward to restrict this metabolism.

PMID:39364056 | PMC:PMC11447295 | DOI:10.3389/fphar.2024.1441147

Ann Pharmacother. 2024 Oct 3:10600280241284923. doi: 10.1177/10600280241284923. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hypoalbuminemia is common in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies. However, despite the increased use of highly protein-bound tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in cancer treatments, the tolerability of these agents in patients with hypoalbuminemia is not fully known.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to assess whether patients on oral TKIs with hypoalbuminemia are at higher risk for experiencing medication-related adverse events, therefore requiring careful considerations.

METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective study including patients ≥18 years of age with a solid tumor malignancy who had taken at least one dose of oral TKIs with a protein binding of ≥90% between June 1, 2016, and June 1, 2021. The primary outcome was to compare time to TKI discontinuation due to adverse events between patients with and without hypoalbuminemia. Key secondary outcomes include TKI discontinuation and dose reduction rates, time to TKI dose reduction, and severity of adverse events.

RESULTS: Out of 282 included patients, 134 (48%) patients had hypoalbuminemia and 148 (52%) had normal albumin levels. Compared with patients without hypoalbuminemia, patients with hypoalbuminemia had shorter median time on treatment at 2.8 months (95% CI = 2.3-4.5 months) versus 4.3 months (95% CI = 2.8-6.4 months; P = 0.003). In patients who had TKI discontinuation, dose reduction was associated with longer time on treatment in patients in the normal albumin group compared with patients in the hypoalbuminemia group or patients without dose reduction (P < 0.0001). Patients in the hypoalbuminemia group experienced significantly more grade 3/4 adverse events compared with those in the normal albumin group (73% vs 27%, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Hypoalbuminemia is a risk factor for both shorter time on treatment and more severe adverse events in patients with solid tumor malignancies taking highly protein-bound oral TKIs. This study highlights the need for closer monitoring of this patient population by health care providers.

PMID:39363502 | DOI:10.1177/10600280241284923

BMC Womens Health. 2024 Oct 3;24(1):545. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03355-x.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the breast cancer treatment, there may be a gap between patients' information needs and physicians' perceptions. To address this issue, we conducted a comprehensive questionnaire survey aimed to assess the specific information needs of patients regarding the adverse events (AEs) associated with treatment.

METHODS: A web-based questionnaire survey (UMIN000049280: Registered on October 31, 2022) was conducted in patients with a history of breast cancer treatment. Responses were obtained regarding AEs experienced, AEs for which remedies were identified, AEs patients sought to prevent, and pre-treatment information on AEs patients desired to have.

RESULTS: Data from 435 breast cancer patients were analyzed. The most common AEs reported included hair loss (93.3%), malaise/fatigue (89.4%), nail changes (83.2%), dysgeusia (69.0%), leukopenia/white blood cell decreased (65.1%), neuropathy (62.3%), and nausea/vomiting (61.4%). Financial anxiety was reported in 35.2% of the participants. AEs for which a minority of patients found effective solutions included neuropathy (20.3%), financial anxiety (21.6%), edema (24.3%), joint pain (26.0%), and malaise/fatigue (26.7%). Patients expressed the greatest desire to avoid hair loss (34.7%), followed by nausea/vomiting (23.7%), interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis (5.5%), malaise/fatigue (5.1%), and dysgeusia (5.1%). The most commonly requested pre-treatment information regarding AEs was their duration, followed by prevention methods, management strategies, time to onset, and the impact on daily life.

CONCLUSIONS: This survey highlights the existence of significant unmet medical needs among breast cancer patients, due to the inadequate solutions available for managing AEs associated with various therapeutic agents. In addition, the survey revealed that patients have different information needs regarding different types of AEs.

PMID:39363303 | PMC:PMC11447999 | DOI:10.1186/s12905-024-03355-x

PLoS One. 2024 Oct 3;19(10):e0309796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309796. eCollection 2024.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adverse drug reaction is one of the emerging challenges in antiretroviral treatment. Determining the incidence rate and predictors among children on antiretroviral treatment (ART) is essential to improve treatment outcomes and minimize harm. And also, evidence regarding the time to major adverse drug reactions and its predictors among children on antiretroviral treatment is limited in Ethiopia.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the time to major adverse drug reaction and its predictors among children on antiretroviral treatment at selected public hospitals in Northwest Amhara, Ethiopia, 2023.

METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 380 children on antiretroviral treatment who enrolled from June 27, 2017, to May 31, 2022. Data was collected using a structured data extraction checklist. Data were entered into Epidata 4.6 and analyzed using STATA 14. The incidence rate of major adverse drug reactions was determined per person/months. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify predictors of major adverse drug responses. A p-value less than 0.05 with a 95% CI was used to declare statistical significance.

RESULT: The minimum and maximum follow-up time was 6 and 59 months, respectively. The study participants were followed for a total of 9916 person-months. The incidence rate of major adverse drug reactions was 3.5 /1000 person-months. Advanced clinical stages of HIV/AIDS (III and IV) [adjusted hazard ratio = 7.3, 95% CI: 2.74-19.60)], poor treatment adherence [adjusted hazard ratio = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.21-0.42], taking antiretroviral treatment twice and more [adjusted hazard ratio = 3.43, 955 CI: (1.26-9.33)] and not taking opportunistic infection prophylaxis [adjusted hazard ratio = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.23-0.52)] were predictors of major adverse drug reactions.

CONCLUSION: The incidence rate of major adverse drug reactions among children on antiretroviral treatment was congruent with studies in Ethiopia. Advanced clinical stages of HIV/AIDS, poor treatment adherence, taking antiretroviral treatment medications twice or more, and not taking opportunistic infection prophylaxis were predictors of major adverse drug reactions.

PMID:39361573 | PMC:PMC11449323 | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0309796

J Lipid Atheroscler. 2024 Sep;13(3):215-231. doi: 10.12997/jla.2024.13.3.215. Epub 2024 Sep 4.

ABSTRACT

Elevated blood cholesterol and triglyceride levels induced by secondary causes are frequently observed. The identification and appropriate handling of these causes are essential for secondary dyslipidemia treatment. Major secondary causes of hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia include an unhealthy diet, diseases and metabolic conditions affecting lipid levels, and therapeutic side effects. It is imperative to correct secondary causes prior to initiating conventional lipid-lowering therapy. Guideline-based lipid therapy can then be administered based on the subsequent lipid levels.

PMID:39355405 | PMC:PMC11439749 | DOI:10.12997/jla.2024.13.3.215

Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2024 Oct;62(10):615-624. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2024.2398119. Epub 2024 Oct 1.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Poisoning is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality that is increasing in many countries. Better data are needed to understand epidemiology and outcomes of poisoning. This work describes a new poisoning data linkage cohort in New South Wales, Australia (population approximately 8 million).

METHODS: This is a longitudinal health record linkage, 2011-2020, including data from: ambulance call-outs, emergency department presentations, hospital admissions, death registrations, the poisons centre, and four tertiary toxicology units. Individuals with poisoning, venomous animal/plant exposures, or adverse drug reaction events were included.

RESULTS: There were 845,217 linkable events relating to 400,642 ambulance, 688,484 emergency department, 682,013 admission, 40,456 toxicology, and 11,879 death records. There were 572,841 people with events; the median age at the time of first event was 57 years, and 51.9% were female. Events leading to patient admission were most commonly adverse drug reactions (n = 511,263), intentional poisonings (n = 68,646), unintentional poisonings (n = 54,840) and animal/plant exposures (n = 11,092). Demographics varied by cause: intentional poisoning (median age 33 years, 61.7% female); unintentional poisoning/animals/plants (median age 43 years, 45% female); and adverse drug reactions (median age 70 years, 54% female). Adolescent females had highest rates of intentional poisoning, while unintentional poisoning had a bimodal distribution, highest in children <5 years old and males aged 20 to 50 years. Substance use disorders were documented comorbidities for 44% of intentional poisoning, 29% of unintentional poisoning, and 13% of adverse drug reaction-related admissions; mood disorders were documented for 54%, 17% and 10% of these admissions, respectively.

DISCUSSION: Poisonings and hospitalised adverse drug reactions are common in New South Wales, affecting approximately 8% of the population in 10 years. This linkage improves understanding of poisoning risks and outcomes in Australia.

CONCLUSIONS: This novel data linkage provides a unique opportunity to study poisoning across multiple settings for an individual over an extended period.

PMID:39350754 | DOI:10.1080/15563650.2024.2398119

Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2024 Sep 30:ejhpharm-2024-004335. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004335. Online ahead of print.

NO ABSTRACT

PMID:39349010 | DOI:10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004335

Lung Cancer. 2024 Oct;196:107966. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107966. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: KRAS (G12C) inhibitors (sotorasib and adagrasib) have approved treatment in patients with KRAS (G12C)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The post-marketing data concerning KRAS (G12C) inhibitors remain limited, and the outcomes of relevant studies are yet to yield conclusive evidence supporting the long-term safety of KRAS (G12C) inhibitors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This investigation comprehensively assessed adverse events (AEs) attributed to KRAS (G12C) inhibitors by employing advanced data mining techniques, utilizing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). The dataset encompasses the period from the first quarter of 2021 to the first quarter of 2024. A disproportionality analysis was conducted to quantify the correlation between KRAS (G12C) inhibitors and AEs. The metrics employed for the evaluation of disproportionality comprise the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the information component (IC), and the empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM).

RESULTS: A total of 2,253 and 486 reports were identified as related to sotorasib and adagrasib, with the identification of 51 and 26 preferred terms, respectively. The most frequent AEs of sotorasib comprised diarrhoea (ROR 5.27), hepatotoxicity (ROR 38.09), alanine aminotransferase increased (ROR 17.41), aspartate aminotransferase increased (ROR 20.88), and hepatic function abnormal (ROR 19.88). The most common AEs of adagrasib included diarrhoea (ROR 4.21), nausea (ROR 3.84), vomiting (ROR 5.36), decreased appetite (ROR 4.79), and dehydration (ROR 7.00). A relatively reduced risk of hepatotoxicity but a increased risk of serious AEs in adagrasib compared to sotorasib (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: Our findings would provide valued evidence for healthcare professionals to recognize AEs associated with KRAS (G12C) inhibitors and differences between sotorasib and adagrasib, and guide their clinical practice.

PMID:39342769 | DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107966

Drugs Aging. 2024 Oct;41(10):833-846. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01148-3. Epub 2024 Sep 29.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Older inpatients with dementia are at an increased risk of an adverse drug reaction (ADR) during hospitalization.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the prevalence of ADRs in older inpatients according to dementia status and ADR definition approach and to identify risk factors of ADRs during hospitalization.

METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 2000 inpatients aged ≥ 75 years admitted consecutively to six Sydney hospitals (1 July 2016 to 31 May 2017). Dementia was defined by diagnosis in electronic medical records. ADRs were defined according to two approaches: the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM) and classification by a research pharmacist (subset cohort, n = 600). A binary logistic regression was conducted to determine risk factors of ADRs.

RESULTS: Among 2000 patients, 25.9% (n = 517) were reported to have dementia. ADRs defined by ICD-10-AM were identified in 8.3% (n = 43) and 14.6% (n = 217) of inpatients with and without dementia respectively (p < 0.001). A total of 13.0% (n = 260) and 12.5% (n = 75) of patients had ADRs defined by ICD-10-AM and a research pharmacist, respectively. Key risk factors of ADRs were longer hospital stay [odds ratio (OR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01, 1.02) and a greater number of regular potentially inappropriate medicines (PIMs) on admission (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.00, 1.38).

CONCLUSIONS: ADRs were more prevalent among inpatients without dementia and when assessed by a research pharmacist. Our findings underline the need for improved ADR detection in older inpatients.

PMID:39342531 | DOI:10.1007/s40266-024-01148-3

Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Sep 29;46(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40902-024-00445-6.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Xerostomia, or dry mouth, can be a temporary or persistent symptom resulting from various factors, such as medication use, therapeutic radiation, chemotherapy, autoimmune conditions (e.g., Sjögren's syndrome), and hormonal imbalances. Xerostomia often leads to associated mucositis, which significantly impacts patients' quality of life. The nano-bio-fusion (NBF) gingival gel, a gel-type functional toothpaste containing vitamins C, E, propolis, and herbal extracts in a nano-emulsion state, has shown potential in accelerating the healing of oral mucosal lesions.

METHODS: A total of 127 patients (102 females, 25 males) with persistent xerostomia were treated from 2018 to 2023. Of these, 32 patients were treated exclusively with NBF Gel, while 95 patients received NBF Gel in combination with other medications, such as pilocarpine. The underlying causes of xerostomia included irradiation and chemotherapy (12 patients), medication (40 patients), hormonal imbalance (28 patients), and Sjögren's syndrome (47 patients). NBF Gel was applied 2-3 times daily to the tongue and oral mucosa. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated through physical examinations and a patient-reported scale ranging from 1 (no improvement) to 10 (complete improvement), focusing on the healing of mucosal lesions rather than saliva production.

RESULTS: Both treatment groups showed significant improvements in the healing of xerostomia-associated mucositis, particularly in severe cases with visible lesions. Patients treated with NBF Gel reported improved symptoms related to mucosal health, while those who received combination therapy also experienced reduced side effects of pilocarpine due to dose reduction. The most substantial improvements were observed in patients with drug-induced and hormonally-caused xerostomia-related mucositis. No adverse side effects from NBF Gel were reported during the study.

CONCLUSION: NBF gingival gel proved to be beneficial in accelerating the healing of mucositis associated with xerostomia, regardless of the underlying cause, including medication use, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormonal imbalances, and Sjögren's syndrome. It presents a promising adjunctive treatment to improve mucosal health and quality of life for patients suffering from xerostomia-associated mucositis.

PMID:39342518 | PMC:PMC11439858 | DOI:10.1186/s40902-024-00445-6

BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2024 Sep 27;25(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40360-024-00790-2.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Tafamidis-associated adverse events (AEs) were investigated retrospectively by data mining the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to inform clinical safety.

METHODS: Data were gathered from the FAERS database, which spans the second quarter of 2019 to the fourth quarter of 2023. A total number of 8532 reports of Tafamidis-related adverse events were detected after evaluating 8,432,351 data. Disproportionality analyses were used to quantify the signal and assess the significance of Tafamidis-associated AEs using four algorithms, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) and the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN).

RESULTS: Among the 8532 reports of AEs with Tafamidis as the primary suspected drug, Tafamidis-induced AEs were identified as occurring in 27 system organ classes (SOC). A total of 207 Tafamidis-induced AEs were detected which simultaneously complied with the four algorithms. Our analysis also identified new adverse reactions including Hypoacusis, Deafness, and Essential hypertension. The median onset of adverse reactions associated with Tafamidis was 180 days (interquartile range [IQR] 51-419 days).

CONCLUSION: Tafamidis is a drug that has shown favorable safety and tolerability results in clinical trials. However, a number of adverse reactions associated with Tafamidis have been identified through analysis of the FAERS database. In clinical applications, it is recommended to closely monitor patients' hearing while using Tafamidis. In addition, it is hoped that further experimental and clinical studies will be conducted in the future to understand the mechanism of occurrence between Tafamidis and adverse reactions such as primary hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and height reduction.

PMID:39334280 | PMC:PMC11438280 | DOI:10.1186/s40360-024-00790-2

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 28;24(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02692-z.

ABSTRACT

Identifying and managing the most critical side effects encourages patients to take medications regularly and adhere to the course of treatment. Therefore, priority should be given to the more important ones, among these side effects. However, the number of studies that make a priority examination is limited. There is a need for a new study that determines which of these effects are more priority to increase the quality of the treatment. Accordingly, this study aims to define the most important side effects of antidepressant drugs with a novel model. Quantum Spherical fuzzy M-SWARA technique is considered to compute the importance weights of the items. The main contribution of this study is that the most critical side effects can be understood for antidepressant drugs by establishing a novel decision-making model. The findings demonstrate that psychological side effects are defined as the most critical side effects of antidepressant drugs. Furthermore, physical side effects also play a key role in this condition. Side effects in antidepressant treatment have a great impact on the effectiveness of treatment and patient compliance.

PMID:39342208 | PMC:PMC11438092 | DOI:10.1186/s12911-024-02692-z

Genes (Basel). 2024 Aug 24;15(9):1116. doi: 10.3390/genes15091116.

ABSTRACT

Following the advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is now rarely challenging. However, data are still limited concerning DAA use in patients affected by glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PDd). Based on these considerations, the goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DAAs in this subpopulation. A retrospective multicenter observational study (2015-2023) was conducted on all 2754 consecutive HCV-positive patients treated with first- and second-generation all-oral DAAs, and with a G6PDd diagnosis confirmed by quantitative testing (n = 38). At the treating clinician's discretion, an enhanced clinical and laboratory follow-up was performed, generally on a monthly basis both during treatment and up to six months after the end of it. Concerning hematochemical parameters, no significant differences were found between any considered time point. In all cases, no treatment-related adverse events were reported, and virologic response rates were as expected without G6PDd. In conclusion, in a large experience which, to the best of our knowledge, is unprecedented in the literature, the treatment of HCV hepatitis with nearly all available DAAs in patients with G6PDd as a comorbidity-a common occurrence in countries such as Italy-proved to be highly effective and safe.

PMID:39336707 | PMC:PMC11431558 | DOI:10.3390/genes15091116

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Sep 3. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16730. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

There is increasing evidence that cannabidiol (CBD) use is associated with clinically significant liver enzyme (LE) elevations and drug-induced liver injury (DILI). The proportion of LE elevations and DILI events reported in the literature meet the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences' (CIOMS) classification of a common adverse drug reaction. However, these potential adverse events are unknown to many clinicians and may be overlooked. The increasing use of CBD for both medical and non-medical use necessitates clear direction in the diagnosis and management of CBD-associated hepatotoxicity. To our knowledge, no such clinical guidance currently exists. For people presenting with elevated LEs, CBD use should be screened for and be considered in the differential diagnosis. This narrative review will provide clinicians with guidance in the prevention, detection, and management of CBD-related hepatotoxicity.

PMID:39228144 | DOI:10.1111/jgh.16730

Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2024 Sep 3:ejhpharm-2024-004131. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004131. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are among the leading standalone causes of morbidity and hospitalisation and contribute substantially to an increase in healthcare expenditure. Repeat ADR events, although difficult to quantify, are a recognised problem that lead to preventable suffering for the patient. The current approaches for the prevention of ADR recurrence in low/middle-income countries range from inefficient to non-existent. There is very little literature that focuses on the preventability of ADRs in such settings. This study aimed to develop the ADR Alert Card, an economical innovation designed as a stop gap in preventing ADR recurrence, and to evaluate its utility by validating the system through input from medical professionals.

METHODS: The ADR Alert Card was validated and registered with the Copyrights Office of the Government of India. To obtain the opinion of healthcare professionals and gauge the status quo in prevention of ADR recurrence, we conducted an online descriptive cross-sectional study over a period of 6 months.

RESULTS: The survey received 218 responses. Demographics varied, ranging across different healthcare specialties and years of experience. Our study found that existing practice in ADR recurrence prevention was inadequate, and most healthcare workers were unaware of an alternative approach. Unique solutions were provided by the respondents, with the majority favouring a card format for preventing recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS: After being introduced to the ADR Alert Card, there was an overwhelming consensus on the utility and practicality of this card in preventing ADR recurrence.

PMID:39227143 | DOI:10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004131

Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2024 Sep 2. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2399094. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the United States clozapine was first approved for treatment-resistant schizophrenia and then for suicidality in schizophrenia psychoses. Systematic reviews support clozapine's anti-suicidal effect, but the forensic literature stresses its lethality during overdoses.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Clozapine reports to the international pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase) were analyzed for suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, intentional overdose, and completed suicides from introduction to 1 January 2024. VigiBase uses the information component (IC) as a disproportionality analysis.

RESULTS: The clozapine ICs (range: other antipsychotics) were: 1) suicidal ideation IC = 0.570 with IC025 = 0.454 to IC975 = 0.680 (IC = 3.568 for aripiprazole and 1.729 for risperidone), 2) suicide attempt IC = 1.428 with IC025 = 1.323 to IC975 = 1.529 (IC = 4.150 for quetiapine and 2.968 for risperidone), 3) intentional overdose: IC = 0.995 with IC025 = 0.864 to IC975 = 1.120 (IC = 4.080 for quetiapine and 1.957 for aripiprazole), and 4) completed suicide IC = 1.133 with IC025 = 1.026 to IC975 = 1.235 (IC = 4.648 for quetiapine and 2.160 for risperidone). In summary, all clozapine ICs were significantly lower. We found 2391 clozapine-treated patients on the suicidality spectrum (627 cases with suicidal ideation, 752 with suicide attempt, 488 with intentional overdose and 731 with completed suicide) but many were taking other antipsychotics. The most frequent reporting countries were the United States, the United Kingdom, and Croatia.

CONCLUSION: This pharmacovigilance study, with all its inherent limitations, provides independent proof, not overlapping with prior literature, that clozapine may have specific strong anti-suicidal effects that do not appear to be present in other antipsychotics. Further VigiBase studies are needed to compare the lethality of an intentional overdose of clozapine (14.3%) with other antipsychotics.

PMID:39223773 | DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2399094

Cureus. 2024 Aug 1;16(8):e65945. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65945. eCollection 2024 Aug.

ABSTRACT

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), a widely used antibiotic, is associated with both predictable dose-dependent side effects and rare, idiosyncratic adverse reactions. Here, we report the case of a previously healthy, non-G6PD-deficient, 27-year-old male who developed three idiosyncratic reactions: severe thrombocytopenia, aseptic meningitis, and hepatitis concurrently following TMP-SMX administration. The Naranjo adverse reaction probability score was 7, implying TMP-SMX as the probable cause of the clinical presentation. After a comprehensive workup to rule out alternate etiologies, we have established TMP-SMX as the culprit. Our case highlights the importance of early recognition of TMP-SMX-induced rare adverse events for appropriate management to mitigate long-term sequelae and ensure favorable patient outcomes.

PMID:39221287 | PMC:PMC11365456 | DOI:10.7759/cureus.65945

Epilepsy Behav. 2024 Aug 30;159:109989. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.109989. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability, including behavior and executive functioning, during adjunctive lacosamide (LCM) treatment in pediatric patients (≥1 month to <18 years of age) with focal-onset or generalized seizures enrolled in 2 open-label, long-term follow-up trials.

METHODS: Two open-label extension trials (SP848: NCT00938912; EP0034: NCT01964560) were conducted in pediatric patients who had participated in previous trials of adjunctive LCM (SP0847/NCT00938431; SP0966/NCT01969851; EP0060/NCT02710890; SP0967/NCT02477839; SP0969/NCT01921205); SP848 also directly enrolled eligible pediatric patients who had not previously participated in a clinical trial of LCM. Outcomes included retention, efficacy, and safety/tolerability. Patient improvement was assessed with Clinician's and Caregiver's Global Impression of Change scale. Behavior and emotional function was assessed with Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and executive functioning was assessed with Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function® (BRIEF).

RESULTS: The pooled dataset from both trials included 905 patients (851 in the focal-onset seizure population and 47 in the generalized seizure population). In the overall population, Kaplan-Meier-estimated 1-year retention was 80 %. From baseline to the end of the treatment period, patients in the focal-onset seizure population had a median percent reduction in focal-onset seizure frequency per 28 days of 60.4 %, 55.4 % of patients were 50 % responders, and 40.8 % of patients were 75 % responders. In patients with ≥12 months of LCM treatment, ≥12 month seizure freedom during the LCM treatment period was achieved by 29.9 % of patients in the focal-onset seizure population (median duration of first ≥12-month seizure-free interval: 641 days) and 24.4 % of patients in the generalized seizure population (median duration of first ≥12-month seizure-free interval: 665 days). Improvement during LCM treatment was reported in >75 % of patients by both physicians and caregivers. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 749 (82.8 %) patients, most commonly pyrexia (18.9 %), upper respiratory tract infection (18.6 %), nasopharyngitis (16.2 %), vomiting (15.7 %), and somnolence (11.8 %). The most common drug-related TEAEs were somnolence (8.5 %), dizziness (7.6 %), and vomiting (5.4 %). Behavioral and emotional function was generally stable in patients 1.5-5 years of age and slightly improved in patients ≥6 years of age, and executive functioning was stable in patients <5 years of age and generally slightly improved in patients 5-18 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of a large patient pool from 2 open-label trials, long-term adjunctive LCM was efficacious and generally well tolerated in children with epilepsy and focal-onset or generalized seizures. Behavior and executive functioning were generally stable without observable worsening during long-term adjunctive LCM treatment.

PMID:39216464 | DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.109989

Trials. 2024 Aug 31;25(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08418-w.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are typically designed to determine beneficial intervention effects. In addition, an important aspect of every trial is to collect data on any potential harmful effects, with the aim of ensuring that the benefit-risk balance is appropriate. The language used by trialists to describe these potential harmful effects is inconsistent. In pharmacological trials, researchers collect adverse events; when a causal relationship is suspected adverse events are further classified as adverse reactions. Academic researchers have moved to collectively refer to these as harm outcomes; the pharmaceutical industry refer to these events as safety outcomes. In trials of complex interventions, phrases such as unintended consequences or effects are used. With the inconsistent use of terminology by researchers and the potential benefits to be gained from harmonising communications, we sought public opinion on terminology used to describe harmful effects and how these outcomes are communicated in the scientific literature, as well as in public facing material on medications.

METHODS: We held two in-person public involvement meetings with public partners, in London and Aberdeen in 2023. Both meetings followed a pre-specified format. We provided a background to the topic including the information researchers collect on potential harms in clinical trials and shared examples on how this information gets presented in practice. We then discussed public partners' perspectives on terminology used and communication of intervention harm in academic journals and in public facing materials. A summary of these discussions and the main topics raised by public partners are presented.

RESULTS: Public partners endorsed the use of different terms for different situations, preferring the use of 'side-effect' across all contexts and reserving the use of 'harm' to indicate more severe events. Generally, public partners were happy with the type of information presented in public facing materials but discussions revealed that presentation of information on public NHS websites led to misconceptions about harm.

CONCLUSION: This work provides a starting point on preferred terminology by patients and the public to describe potential harmful intervention effects. Whilst researchers have tried to seek agreement, public partners endorsed use of different terms for different situations. We highlight some key areas for improvement in public facing materials that are necessary to avoid miscommunication and incorrect perception of harm.

PMID:39215336 | DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08418-w

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Aug 30;103(35):e39347. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039347.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical benefit of monotherapy with AKT inhibitors in patients diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for articles reporting treatment with AKT inhibitors in TNBC. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included the clinical benefit rate (CBR, included the proportion of patients with complete response, partial response, and stable disease), overall response rate (ORR, included the proportion of patients with complete response and partial response), all drug-related adverse events (AEs), and ≥3 grade drug-related grade AE.

RESULTS: We included 723 patients from 5 studies and observed a pooled progression-free survival of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.62-1.02; The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations [GRADE] assessment: moderate certainty) and OS of 0.7 (95% CI: 0.50-0.99; GRADE assessment: high certainty) in TNBC patients treated with AKT inhibitors. Regarding clinical benefit rate and overall response rate were 1.21 (95% CI 0.85-1.73; GRADE assessment: moderate certainty) and 1.26 (95% CI 0.91-1.73; GRADE assessment: low certainty). Only OS had a statistical difference. For the odd ratio of all grade AE and ≥3 grade AE in the therapeutic process was counted and pooled, 4.34 (95% CI 1.33-14.14; GRADE assessment: moderate certainty) and 1.76 (95% CI 1.28-2.41; GRADE assessment: moderate certainty), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: AKT inhibitors showed slightly better efficacy in the treatment of TNBC. However, further studies are needed to evaluate its long-term safety and optimal regimen, and caution should be exercised in patients with coexisting gastrointestinal disorders. The clinical characteristics of the patients and the choice of drugs should be considered on an individual basis.

PMID:39213250 | DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000039347